Determination of the permissible storage time of polymeric composite materials after surface treatment with atmospheric pressure plasma before bonding

Barannikov A.A., Sudyin Yu.I., Veshkin E.A, Satdinov R.A.
UDC
678.8
DOI
10.18577/2307-6046-2022-0-5-26-40
Article PDF (Russian) (1.4 MB)
How to cite
Barannikov A.A., Sudyin Yu.I., Veshkin E.A, Satdinov R.A. Determination of the permissible storage time of polymeric composite materials after surface treatment with atmospheric pressure plasma before bonding // Proceedings of VIAM. 2022. No. 5. DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2022-0-5-26-40. URL: https://test.viam.ru/en/journal/2022/5/3
Keywords
fiberglass, carbon fiber, peeling resistance, helicopter rotor blade, adhesive bond, atmospheric pressure plasma, adhesive shear, contact angle, free energy of the surface, storage time of treated surfaces
Abstract

The article notes the results of a study to determine the permissible storage time interval between the surface treatment of polymer composite materials based on adhesive prepregs by atmospheric pressure plasma and the bonding process. It was found that this time interval is no more than 6 months. At the same time, the surface of VPS-53K fiberglass and VKU-30K.UMT49 carbon fiber remains hydrophilic. Morphological changes are of a similar nature, both on the day of surface treatment of both materials, and after 1, 3 and 6 months of storage. Free surface energy and work of adhesion also remain at the proper high level. It was found that with an increase in the time interval between the APP treatment and the gluing process, a decrease in the strength of the glued joint is observed.

Reference list
  1. Kablov E.N. Composites: today and tomorrow. Metally Evrazii, 2015, no. 1, pp. 36–39.
  2. Kablov E.N. In the history of VIAM, Petr Dementiev occupies a special place. Krylya Rodiny, 2017, no. 1, pp. 1–2.
  3. Kablov E.N., Petrova A.P., Narsky A.R. Alexei Tikhonovich Tumanov is the founder of new scientific directions in materials science. Available at: http://www.viam.ru/public (accessed: December 07, 2021).
  4. Kablov E.N. Materials of a new generation and digital technologies for their processing. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 2020, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 331–334.
  5. Kablov E.N. Formation of domestic space materials science. Vestnik RFFI, 2017, no. 3, pp. 97–105.
  6. Kablov E.N. VIAM: new generation materials for PD-14. Krylya Rodiny, 2019, no. 7–8, pp. 54–58.
  7. Vilnave Zh.Zh. Adhesive connections. Moscow: Technosfera, 2007, 384 p.
  8. Cagle Ch. Adhesive connections. Ed. Kardashov D.A. Moscow: Mir, 1971, 295 p.
  9. Composite materials handbook. Vol. 3: Polymer matrix composites materials usage, design, and analysis. US Department of Defense handbook, 2002, 734 p.
  10. Peters S.T. Handbook of Composites. Second Ed. Chapman & Hall, 1998, 1120 p.
  11. Barannikov A.A., Postnov V.I., Veshkin E.A., Strelnikov S.V. The role of fiberglass surface preparation for gluing. Klei. Germetiki. Tekhnologii, 2019, no. 6, pp. 19–27. DOI: 10.31044/1813-7008-2019-0-6-19-27.
  12. Bogdanova Yu.G. Adhesion and its role in ensuring the strength of polymer composites: textbook. allowance. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2010, 68 p.
  13. Barannikov A.A., Рostnov V.I., Veshkin E.A., Starostina I.V. Link between the energy characteristics of the surface of fiberglass of the VPS-53К brand and the strength of the adhesive joint based on it. Trudy VIAM, 2020, no. 10 (92), paper no. 05. Available at: http://www.viam-works.ru (accessed: November 12, 2021). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2020-0-10-40-50.
  14. Barannikov A.A., Satdinov R.A., Veshkin E.A., Kurshev E.V. The effect of atmospheric pressure plasma on the strength of an adhesive bond based on CFPR. Trudy VIAM, 2021, no. 12 (106), paper no. 01. Available at: http://www.viam-works.ru (accessed: 12 January, 2022). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2021-0-12-47-54.
  15. Barannikov A.A., Postnova M.V., Krasheninnikova E.V., Vasyukov A.N. Application of new technologies in the production of helicopter main rotor blades. Trudy VIAM, 2021, no. 11 (105), paper no. 09. Available at: http://www.viam-works.ru (accessed: 12 January, 2022). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2021-0-11-91-102.
  16. Tracey A.C. Effect of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment on Surface Characteristics and Adhesive Bond Quality of Peel Ply Prepared Composites. Available at: https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/handle/1773/27522 (accessed: November 12, 2021).
  17. Takeda T., Yasuoka T., Hoshi H. et al. Effectiveness of flame-based surface treatment for adhesive bonding of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy matrix composites. Composites. Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2019, vol. 119, pp. 30–37.
  18. Zaldivar R.J., Nokes J., Steckel G.L. et al. The Effect of Atmospheric Plasma Treatment on the Chemistry, Morphology and Resultant Bonding Behavior of a Pan-Based Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy Composite. Journal of Composite Materials, 2009, vol. 44, is. 2, pp. 137–156. DOI: 10.1177/0021998309345343.
  19. Dighton C., Rezai A., Ogin S.L., Watts J.F. Atmospheric plasma treatment of CFRP composites to enhance structural bonding investigated using surface analytical techniques. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2019, vol. 91, pp. 142–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.03.010.
  20. Zaldivar R.J., Steckel G.L, Morgan B.A. et al. Bonding Optimization on Composite Surfaces using Atmospheric Plasma Treatment. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2012, vol. 26, is. 1–3, pp. 381–401.
  21. Hansen W. Plasma for Aviation and Aerospace Industries. Available at: https://www.plasmatreat.com/downloads/english/15-04_IST_aerospace.pdf (accessed: July 12, 2021).
  22. Langer M., Otto D. Methods for studying the surface characteristics of polymers after plasma treatment. Comparative analysis. Analiz i kontrol: tekhnologii, pribory, resheniya, 2018, no. 2 (39), pp. 2–7.
  23. Williams T., Yu H., Hicks R. Atmospheric pressure plasma activation of polymers and composites for adhesive bonding: A Critical Review. Reviews of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2013, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 46–87. DOI: 10.7569/RAA.2013.097302.
  24. Serrano J.S. Surface modifications of composite materials by atmospheric pressure plasma treatment: PhD-Thesis. Madrid: Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 2011, 302 p. Available at: https://eciencia.urjc.es/bitstream/10115/11379/1/Thesis_June%202011%20JSS-SLU-AUF_v5.pdf (accessed: July 12, 2021).
  25. Gleich H. Zusammenhang zwischen Oberflächenenergie und Adhäsionsvermögen von Polymer werkstoffen am Beispiel von PP und PBT und deren Beeinflussung durch die Niederdruck-Plasmatechnologie: dis. Universtät Duisburg-Essen, 2004, 103 p. Available at: https://duepublico2.unidue.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/duepublico_derivate_00005593/gleichdiss.pdf (accessed: July 12, 2021).
  26. Rodríguez B.N. Pre-Treatment for adhesive bonding of aerospace composite components: PhM-Thesis. London: Brunel University, 2016, 133 p. Available at: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/ 2438/14669/1/FulltextThesis.pdf (accessed: November 12, 2021).
  27. Al-Maliki H.L.R. Adhesive and tribological behaviour of cold atmospheric plasma-treated polymer surfaces: PhD Dissertation. Gödöllő: Szent István University, 2018, 115 p. Available at: https://szie.hu/sites/default/files/hayder_lateef_dissertation.pdf (accessed: November 12, 2021).
  28. Lisco F., Shaw A., Wright A. et al. Atmospheric-pressure plasma surface activation for solution processed photovoltaic devices. Solar Energy, 2017, vol. 146, pp. 287–297.
  29. Kostova K.G., Nishimea T.M.C., Castroa A.H.R. et al. Surface modification of polymeric materials by cold atmospheric plasma jet. Applied Surface Science, 2014, vol. 314, pp. 367–375.
  30. Akiyama H., Hasegawa K., Sekigawa T., Yamazaki N. Atmospheric pressure plasma treatment for composites bonding. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review, 2018, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 1–5.
  31. Lucchetta G. Experimental analysis of atmospheric plasma treatment and resin optimization for adhesive bonding of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Available at: http://tesi.cab.unipd.it/48832/1/Tesi_ANTONELLO_Julien.pdf (accessed: November 12, 2021).
  32. Calomfirescu M., Neumaier R., Maier A. et al. Certification Concept and Development of a Bonded Eurofighter Airbrake Flight Demonstrator. Available at: https://www.sto.nato.int/publications/STO%20Meeting%20Proceedings/STO-MP-AVT-266/MP-AVT-266-07.pdf (accessed: November 12, 2021).
  33. Gardiner G. The future of CFRP aerostructures assembly. Available at:https://www.compositesworld.com/articles/the-future-of-cfrp-aerostructures-assembly (accessed: November 12, 2021).
  34. Kablov E.N. Innovative developments of FSUE «VIAM» SSC of RF on realization of «Strategic directions of the development of materials and technologies of their processing for the period until 2030». Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii, 2015, no. 1 (34), pp. 3–33. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2015-0-1-3-33.
  35. Lukina N.F., Dementeva L.A., Petrova A.P., Anihovskaya L.I. Gluing materials in the design of blades of helicopters. Trudy VIAM, 2016, no. 7, paper no. 07. Available at: http://www.viam-works.ru (accessed: November 12, 2021). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2016-0-7-7-7.
  36. Starkov A.I., Kutsevich K.E., Tyumeneva T.Yu. Development of adhesive composite material based on UMT49S-12K-EP alternative carbon filler and VSK-14-3 adhesive binder. Trudy VIAM, 2020, no. 6–7 (89), paper no. 07. Available at: http://www.viam-works.ru (accessed: November 12, 2021). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2020-0-67-62-71.
  37. Sharova I. A. Domestic and foreign experience in area of cold curing epoxy adhesive development. Trudy VIAM, 2014, no. 7, paper no. 05. Available at: http://viam-works.ru (accessed: November 12, 2021). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2014-0-7-5-5.
  38. Isaev A.Yu., Pavlyuk B.Ph., Petrova A.P., Lukina N.Ph., Balabanova O.S. Effect of modification of cold cured epoxy adhesives with elastomers on the resource strength of adhesive joint. Trudy VIAM, 2020, no. 9 (91), paper no. 03. Available at: http://www.viam-works.ru (accessed: November 12, 2021). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2020-0-9-27-34.