Non-destructive methods for residual stress assessment

Pichugin S.S., Shitikov V.S., Golovkov A.N.
Pichugin S.S., Shitikov V.S., Golovkov A.N. Non-destructive methods for residual stress assessment // Proceedings of VIAM. 2024. No. 1. DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2024-0-1-101-112. URL: https://test.viam.ru/en/journal/2024/1/10
Keywords
residual stresses, diffractometry, nondestructive testing, eddy current testing, potential drop, ultrasonic testing, magnetic testing, Barkhausen noise
Abstract

The article gives an overview of the most common and promising nondestructive methods of residual stress evaluation. Diffractometric, ultrasonic, magnetic, potential drop and eddy current methods of residual stress assessment are presented and their comparative analysis is carried out. Advantages and disadvantages of each method are given, and conclusions are made about application specifics of testing objects made of different materials. This article is relevant for specialists studying the problem of stress-strain state estimation of materials.

Reference list
  1. Kablov E.N., Bakradze M.M., Gromov V.I., Voznesenskaya N.M., Yakusheva N.A. New high strength structural and corrosion-resistant steels for aerospace equipment developed by FSUE «VIAM» (review). Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii, 2020, no. 1 (58), pp. 3–11. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2020-0-1-3-11.
  2. Kablov E.N., Evgenov A.G., Bakradze M.M., Nerush S.V., Krupnina O.A. New generation materials and digital additive technologies for the production of resource parts of FSUE VIAM. Part 1. Materials and synthesis technologies. Electrometallurgiya, 2022, no. 2, pp. 2–12.
  3. Grinevich A.V., Laptev A.B., Skripachev S.Yu., Nuzhnyj G.A. Matrix strength characteristics for the assessment of limit states of structural metallic materials. Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii, 2018, no. 2 (51), pp. 67–74. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2018-0-2-67-74.
  4. Oreshko E.I., Erasov V.S., Yakovlev N.O., Utkin D.A. Methods for determining the mechanical characteristics of materials using indentation (review). Aviation materials and technology, 2021. no. 1 (62), paper no. 10. Available at: http://www.journal.viam.ru (accessed: October 23, 2023). DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2021-0-1-104-118.
  5. Kablov E.N., Startsev V.O. The influence of internal stresses on the aging of polymer composite materials (review). Mekhanika kompozitnykh materialov, 2021, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 805–822.
  6. Monakhov A.D., Yakovlev N.O., Shershak P.V. Methods for the formation of objects with artificially created residual stresses. Aviation materials and technologies, 2023, no. 4 (73), paper no. 12. Available at: http://www.journal.viam.ru (accessed: November 23, 2023). DOI: 10.18577/2713-0193-2023-0-4-122-132.
  7. Rossini N.S., Dassisti M., Benyounis K.Y., Olabi A.G. Methods of measuring residual stresses in components (Review). Materials and Design, 2012, no. 35, pp. 572–588. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.08.022.
  8. Schajer G., Ruud C. Overview of Residual Stresses and their measurement. Practical Residual stress: measurement methods. Ed. G.S. Schajer. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2013, pp. 1–27. DOI: 10.1002/8402832.ch1.
  9. Monakhov A.D., Yakovlev N.O., Avtaev V.V., Kotova E.A. Destructive methods for determining residual stresses (review). Trudy VIAM, 2021, no. 9 (103), paper no. 10. Available at: http://www.viam-works.ru (accessed: October 23, 2023). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2021-0-9-95-104.
  10. Dolle H. Influence of Multiaxial Stress States, Stress Gradients and Elastic Anisotropy on the Evaluation of (Residual) Stresses by X-rays. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 1979, no. 12, pp. 489–501. DOI: 10.1107.S0021889879013169.
  11. Hayaski M., Ohkido S., Minakawa N., Murii Y. Residual Stress Distribution Measurement in Plastically Bent Carbon Steel by Neutron Diffraction. V International Conference on Residual Stresses. Sweden: Linkoping University, 1997, pp. 676–681.
  12. ISO/TS 21432. Non-destructive testing – Standard test method for determining residual stress by neutron diffraction. Switzerland: Technical Specification, 2019, 15 р.
  13. DSF/PrEN 15305. Non-destructive testing – Test method for Residual Stress by X-ray diffraction. Irish: European Standard Working Document, 2005, 88 p.
  14. Reimers W., Pyzalla A., Broda M. et al. The Use of High-Energy Synchrotron Diffraction for Residual Stress Analyses. Journal of Materials Science Letters, 1999, no. 18, pр. 581–583. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006651217517.
  15. Em V.T., Karpov I.D., Sumin V.V. Neutron measurements of residual stresses at the IR-8 reactor of the National Research Center «Kurchatov Institute». V mire nerazrushayushchego kontrolya, 2018, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 20–23.
  16. Ya M., Marquette P., Belahcene F., Lu J. Residual stresses in laser welded aluminium plate by use of ultrasonic and optical methods. Materials Science Engineering, 2004, vol. 382, pp. 257–264. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.05.020.
  17. Marusina M., Fedorov A., Bychenok V., Berkutov I. Ultrasonic Laser Diagnostics of Residual Stresses. Measurement Techniques, 2015, no. 57, pp. 1154–1159. DOI: 10.1007/s11018-015-0595-4.
  18. Karabutov A., Devichensky A., Ivochkin A. et al. Laser ultrasonic diagnostics of residual stress. Ultrasonics, 2008, no. 48, pp. 631–635. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.07.006.
  19. Baryakhtar V.G., Ivanov B.A. In the world of magnetic domains. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 1986, 159 p.
  20. Blaow M., Evans J.T., Shaw B.A. The effect of microstructure and applied stress on magnetic Barkhausen emission in induction hardened steel. Journal of Materials Science, 2007, no. 42, pp. 4364–4371. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-006-0631-5.
  21. Ilker Y.H., Cam I., Hakan G.C. Non-destructive determination of residual stress state in steel weldments by Magnetic Barkhausen Noise technique. NDT&E International, 2010, no. 43, pp. 29–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.08.003.
  22. Kekalo I.B. Physical properties of metals. Section: Electrical properties: Laboratory workshop. Moscow, 1998, 139 p.
  23. Vasilkov D.V., Aleksandrov A.S., Golikova V.V., Kochina T.B. Non-destructive testing of residual stresses in the surface layer of parts made of heat-resistant alloys after machining. IPDME-2021: collection of abstracts of the VIII Int. Scientific and Practical Conf. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State Univ., 2021, pp. 12–17.
  24. Marchenkov A.Yu., Shkatov P.N., Pichugin S.S., Danilchenko S.A., Rudenko E.M., Chernov D.V. Development of a methodology for assessing changes in the specific electrical conductivity of a deformed material using the electropotential method of non-destructive testing. MIKMUS–2021. Moscow: Blagonravov Institute of Mechanical Science, 2021, pp. 563–569.
  25. Bowler N. Four-point potential drop measuring for materials characterization. Measurement Science and Technology, 2010, no. 22, pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/22/1/012001.
  26. Hognestad H., Honne A. Determination of stress in ferromagnetic steel by potential drop measurements. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 1998, vol. 14, pp. 1109–1114.
  27. Blodgett M.P., Nagy P.B. Eddy current assessment of nearsurface residual stress in shot-peened nickel-base superalloys. Journal of nondestructive evaluation, 2004, no. 23, pp. 107–123. DOI: 10.1063/1.1916828.
  28. Sekine Y., Soyama H. Evaluation of equibiaxial compressive stress introduced into austenitic stainless steel using an eddy current method. Journal of nondestructive evaluation, 2011, no. 31, pp. 99–107. DOI: 10.1007/s10921-011-0125-5.
  29. Shitikov V.S., Kodak N.P., Golovkov A.N., Kudinov I.I. Analysis of the features of testing parts made of titanium and heat-resistant alloys using the eddy current method for the presence of cracks. Electrometallurgiya, 2020, no. 8, pp. 20–29. DOI: 10.31044/1684-5781-2020-0-8-20-29.
  30. Shitikov V.S., Kodak N.P., Kutyrev A.E., Vdovin A.I. Application of pulse excitation to assess the degree of corrosion damage of aluminum alloys using the eddy current method. Electrometallurgiya, 2022, no. 9, pp. 34–39. DOI: 10.31044/1684-5781-2022-0-9-34-39.