Nondestructive testing of parts made of ferromagnetic materials

Lednev I.S., Khodakova E.A.
UDC
620.79
DOI
10.18577/2307-6046-2024-0-2-102-115
Article PDF (Russian) (1.13 MB)
How to cite
Lednev I.S., Khodakova E.A. Nondestructive testing of parts made of ferromagnetic materials // Proceedings of VIAM. 2024. No. 2. DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2024-0-2-102-115. URL: https://test.viam.ru/en/journal/2024/2/11
Keywords
magnetic non-destructive testing, ferromagnetic material, defect, modeling, aviation production, testing equipment
Abstract

The article provides a review one of the promising methods of non-destructive testing of parts made of ferromagnetic materials – the method of magnetic memory of metal. The physical foundations application possibilities, advantages and disadvantages of the metal magnetic memory method are considered. Examples of mathematical modeling of signals of the metal magnetic memory method, evaluation of residual stresses and comparison of the results obtained by modeling signals from possible defects with the results obtained in practice are given.

Reference list
  1. Kablov E.N. VIAM: new generation materials for PD-14. Krylya Rodiny, 2019, no. 7–8, pp. 54–58.
  2. Kablov E.N., Startsev V.O. The influence of internal stresses on the aging of polymer composite materials: a review. Mechanics of Composite Materials, 2021, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 565–576. DOI: 10/1007/s11029-021-09979-6.
  3. Kablov E.N. Materials for all times. Nauka i zhizn, 2010, no. 10, pp. 12–19.
  4. Kosarina E.I., Krupnina O.A., Demidov A.A., Mikhaylova N.A. Digital optical pattern and its depen-dence on the radiation image at non-destructive testing by method of digital radiography. Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii, 2019, no. 1 (54), pp. 37–42. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2019-0-1-37-42.
  5. Boychuk A.S., Dikov I.A., Generalov A.S. The increase of sensitivity and resolution of FRP solid samples nondestructive ultrasonic testing using the ultrasonic phased array. Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii, 2019, no. 3 (56), pp. 83–88. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2019-0-3-83-88.
  6. Boychuk A.S., Dikov I.A., Generalov A.S., Slavin A.V. Automated non-destructive inspection of three-layer honeycomb structures’ samples by ultrasonic through-transmission technique.
  7. Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii, 2020, no. 2 (59), pp. 74–80. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2020-0-2-74-80.
  8. Skorobogatko D.S., Golovkov A.N., Kudinov I.I., Kulichkova S.I. Revisiting the ecotoxicity and efficiency of different classes of industrial nonionic surfaces used for cleaning metal surfaces in the process of capillary control of details of the aviation technology (review). Aviation materials and technologies, 2021, no. 4 (65), paper no. 11. Available at: http://www.journal.viam.ru (accessed: November 29, 2023). DOI: 10.18577/2713-0193-2021-0-4-98-106.
  9. Skorobogatko D.S., Golovkov A.N., Kudinov I.I., Kulichkova S.I. Evaluation of efficiency of using water washing solutions based on different classes of surfactants for cleaning metal surfaces before carrying out capillary fluorescent penetrant testing. Aviation materials and technologies, 2023, no. 1 (70), paper no. 10. Available at: http://www.journal.viam.ru (accessed: November 29, 2023). DOI: 10.18577/2713-0193-2023-0-1-137-147.
  10. Krasnov I.S., Lozhkova D.S., Dalin M.A. Evaluation of deficiency of titanium alloy forgings for probabilistic calculation of gas turbine engine disks fracture risk. Aviation materials and technologies, 2021, no. 2 (63), paper no. 12. Available at: https://www.journal.viam.ru (accessed: November 29, 2023). DOI: 10.18577/2713-0193-2021-0-2-115-122.
  11. Suzuki M., Komura I., Takahashi H. Nondestructive estimation of residual stress in welded pressure vessel steel by means of remanent magnetization measurement. The International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 1978, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 87–112.
  12. Atherton D., Coathup L., Jiles D. et al. Stress induced magnetization changes of steel pipes: laboratory tests. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1983, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1564–1568. DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.1983.1062576.
  13. Atherton D., Welbourn C., Jiles D. et al. Stress induced magnetization changes of steel pipes: laboratory tests. Part II. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1984, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 2129–2136. DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.1984.1063572.
  14. Atherton D., Jiles D. Effects of stress on magnetization. NDT International, 1986, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 15–19. DOI: 10.1016/0308-9126(86)90135-5.
  15. Dubov A. A study of metal properties using the method of magnetic memory. Metal Science and Heat Treatment, 1997, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 401–405. DOI: 10.1007/bf02469065.
  16. Shi P., Zheng X. Magnetic charge model for 3D MMM signals. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, 2016, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 45–60. DOI: 10.1080/10589759.2015.1064121.
  17. Jiles D.C. Theory of the magnetomechanical effect. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 1995, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1537–1546. DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/28/8/001.
  18. Dubov A. Development of a metal magnetic memory method. Safety, Diagnosis, and Repair, 2012, vol. 47, pp. 837–839. DOI: 10.1007/s10556-012-9559-6.
  19. Tanasienko A.G., Suntsov S.I., Dubov A.A. Monitoring chemical plant by a metal magnetic memory method. Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 2002, vol. 38, pp. 624–629. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022089310320.
  20. Kuleev V.G., Dubov A.A., Lopatin V.V. Zero-level lines of scattered field on surfaces of ferromagnetic steel pipes with flaws. Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing, 2002, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 343–356. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020965019074.
  21. Dubov A.A. Detection of metallurgical and production defects in engineering components using metal magnetic memory. Metallurgist, 2015, vol. 59, pp. 164–167. DOI: 10.1007/s11015-015-0078-5.
  22. Kuznetsov I.S., Ivashov E.N., Vasin V.A., Baranov A.M. Information technology design in micro- and nanoengineering: textbook in 3 vols. Ivanteevka: Publ. house of the Scientific Research Institute of Limit Technologies, 2014, vol. 3, 234 p.
  23. Pletnev S.V. Magnetic field, properties, application: scientific and educational reference manual. St. Petersburg: Humanistics, 2004, 624 p.
  24. Bokov V.A. Physics of magnets: textbook. Moscow: Nevsky Dialect; BHV-Petersburg, 2002. 272 p.
  25. Preobrazhensky A.A., Bishard E.G. Magnetic materials and elements: a textbook for univ. 3rd ed., rev. and add. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1986, 352 p.
  26. Zhang P., Liu L., Chen W. Analysis of characteristics and key influencing factors in magnetomechanical behavior for cable stress monitoring. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, vol. 62, no. 17. DOI: 10.7498/aps.62.177501.
  27. Shi P., Jin K., Zhang P., Shejuan X. Quantitative inversion of stress and crack in ferromagnetic materials based on metal magnetic memory method. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2018, vol. 99, pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2018.2856894.
  28. Craik D., Wood M. Magnetization changes induced by stress in a constant applied field. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2002, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1009–1016. DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/3/7/303.
  29. Pengpeng S. Analytical solutions of magnetic dipole model for defect leakage magnetic fields. Nondestructive Testing, 2015, vol. 37, pp. 1–7.
  30. Huang H., Jiang S., Yang C. et al. Stress concentration impact on the magnetic memory signal of ferromagnetic structural steel. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, 2014, vol. 29, no. 4,
  31. рр. 377–390. DOI: 10.1080/10589759.2014.949710.
  32. Leng J., Xu M., Li J. et al. Characterization of the elastic-plastic region based on magnetic memory effect. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2010, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 532–536. DOI: 10.3901/CJME.2010.04.532.
  33. Shi P., Bai P., Chen H. et al. The magneto-elastoplastic coupling effect on the magnetic flux leakage signal. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2020, art. 166669. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166669.
  34. Wang Z., Yao K., Deng B. et al. Theoretical studies of metal magnetic memory technique on magnetic flux leakage signals. NDT&E International, 2010, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 354–359. DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.12.006.
  35. Wang Z., Yao K., Deng B. et al. Quantitative study of metal magnetic memory signal versus local stress concentration. NDT&E International, 2010, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 513–518. DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.05.007.
  36. Roskosz M., Rusin A., Bieniek M. Analysis of relationships between residual magnetic field and residual stress. Meccanica, 2013, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 45–55. DOI: 10.1007/s11012-012-9582-x.
  37. Su S., Ma X., Wang W., Yang Y. Stress-dependent magnetic charge model for micro-defects of steel wire based on the magnetic memory method. Research in Nondestructive Evaluation, 2020, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 24–47. DOI: 10.1080/09349847.2019.1617914.
  38. State Standard R ISO 24497-1–2009. Non-destructive testing. Metal magnetic memory method. Part 1. Terms and definitions. Moscow: Standartinform, 2010, 5 p.
  39. State Standard R ISO 24497-2–2009. Non-destructive testing. Metal magnetic memory method. Part 2. General requirements. Moscow: Standartinform, 2010, 6 p.
  40. State Standard R ISO 24497-3–2009. Non-destructive testing. Metal magnetic memory method. Part 3. Inspection of welded joints. Moscow: Standartinform, 2010, 9 p.