Magnetic methods of non-destructive testing of aircraft products

Lednev I.S.
UDC
620.179.1
DOI
10.18577/2307-6046-2025-0-7-141-156
Article PDF (Russian) (1.04 MB)
How to cite
Lednev I.S. Magnetic methods of non-destructive testing of aircraft products // Proceedings of VIAM. 2025. No. 7. DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2025-0-7-141-156. URL: https://test.viam.ru/en/journal/2025/7/11
Keywords
magnetic non-destructive testing, ferromagnetic material, defect, aviation production, Barkhausen effect, magnetic powder control
Abstract

The article provides an overview of the development of magnetic non-destructive testing technologies. After a brief summary of theoretical studies of the effect of magnetic stress coupling, three popular magnetic non-destructive testing technologies based on: detection of the defect scattering field, the Barkhausen effect and magnetic memory of metal are considered. The article considers the physical mechanism and some important experimental results related to the three technologies of non-destructive testing. The problems associated with each method in this area are also summarized.

Reference list
  1. Vonsovsky S.V. Magnetism. Moscow: Nauka, 1971, 1034 p.
  2. Tikazumi S. Physics of Ferromagnetism. Magnetic Characteristics and Practical Applications. Moscow: Mir, 1987, 419 p.
  3. Novikov V.F. Magnetoelastic Properties of Plastically Deformed and Complex-Stressed Magnets. Moscow: Nedra, 1997, 196 p.
  4. Bokov V.A. Physics of Magnets: textbook for Universities. St. Petersburg: Nevsky Dialect, 2002, 155 p.
  5. Spitsyn V.I., Troitsky O.A. Electroplastic Deformation of Metals. Moscow: Nauka, 1985, 160 p.
  6. Dubov A.A., Dubov A.A., Kolokolnikov S.M. Method of magnetic memory of metal and control devices: tutorial. Moscow: Spektr, 2012, 395 p.
  7. Bida G.V. Magnetic properties of heat-treated steels. Ekaterinburg: Ural Branch of the RAS, 2005, 218 p.
  8. Lindgren M., Lepistö T. Modeling of magnetomechanical effect behaviors in a giant magnetostrictive device under compressive stress X. Sensors and Actuators A Physical, 2008, vol. 143 (2), pp. 204–214. DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2007.10.063.
  9. Lindgren M., Lepistö T. Effect of prestraining on Barkhausen noise vs. stress relation. NDT & E International, 2001, vol. 34 (5), pp. 337–344. DOI: 10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00073-6.
  10. Brown W.F. Irreversible Magnetic Effects of Stress. Physical Review, 1949, vol. 75, pp. 147–154.
  11. Cullity B.D. Introduction to Magnetic Materials. N.-Y.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1972, 564 p.
  12. Sablik M.J., Burkhardt G.L., Kwun H., Jiles D.C. A model for the effect of stress on the low-frequency harmonic content of the magnetic induction in ferromagnetic materials. Journal of Applied Physics, 1988, vol. 63 (8), pp. 3930–3932. DOI: 10.1063/1.340609.
  13. Jiles D.C., Atherton D.L. Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 1986, vol. 61 (1-2), pp. 48–60. DOI: 10.1016/0304-8853(86)90066-1.
  14. Wang Z.D., Yao K., Ding K.Q. Theoretical studies of metal magnetic memory technique on magnetic flux leakage signals. NDT & E International, 2010, vol. 43 (4), pp. 354–359. DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.12.006.
  15. Carman G.P., Mitrovic M. Nonlinear Constitutive Relations for Magnetostrictive Materials with Applications to 1-D Problems. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 1995, vol. 6 (5), pp. 673–683. DOI: 10.1177/1045389x9500600508.
  16. Wan Y., Fang D., Hwang K.C. Non-linear constitutive relations for magnetostrictive materials. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 2003, vol. 38 (7), pp. 1053–1065. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7462(02)00052-5.
  17. Wang Z.D., Deng B., Yao K. Physical model of plastic deformation on magnetization in ferromagnetic materials. Journal of Applied Physics, 2011, vol. 109, art. 083928. DOI: 10.1063/1.3574923.
  18. Zatsepin H.N., Shcherbinin V.E. On the calculation of the magnetostatic field of surface defects. Part 1. Topography of the fields of defect models. Defektoskopiya, 1966, no. 5, pр. 50–59.
  19. Sapozhnikov A.B. Some simple nonlinear calculations in the theory of magnetic flaw detection. Trudy SFTI pri TGU, 1950, is. 30, pр. 81–105.
  20. Shcherbinin V.E., Pashagin A.I. The influence of the length of a defect on the magnitude of its magnetic field. Defektoskopiya, 1972, no. 4, pp. 74–82.
  21. Dobmann G. Magnetic leakage techniques in NDT. A state-of-the-art survey of the capabilities for defect detection and sizing. Electromagnetic Methods of NDT, 1985, vol. 3, pp. 71–95.
  22. Li Y., Tian G.Y., Ward S. Numerical simulations on electromagnetic NDT at high speed. Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 2006, vol. 48 (2), pp. 103–108. DOI: 10.1784/insi.2006.48.2.103.
  23. Al-Naemi F.I., Hall J.P., Moses A.J. FEM modeling techniques of magnetic flux leakage-type NDT for ferromagnetic plate inspections. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2006, vol. 304 (2), pp. 790–793. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.02.225.
  24. Babbar V., Shiari B., Clapham L. Mechanical Damage Detection With Magnetic Flux Leakage Tools: Modeling the Effect of Localized Residual Stresses. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2004, vol. 40 (1), pp. 43–49. DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2003.821121.
  25. Ovanesova A.V., Suárez L.E. Applications of wavelet transforms to damage detection in frame structures. Engineering Structures, 2004, vol. 26 (1), pp. 39–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.
  26. Barkhausen Н. Zwei mit Hilfe der neuen Verstarker entdeckte Erscheinunften. Physische Zeitschrift, 1919, jg. 20, no. 17, pp. 401–403.
  27. Clapham L., White S., Lee J., Atherton D.L. Stress measurement using magnetic Barkhausen noise and metal magnetic memory testing. Journal of Applied Physics, 2000, vol. 88 (4), pp. 2163–2168.
  28. Stefanita С.-G., Atherton D.L., Clapham L. Plastic versus elastic deformation effects on magnetic Barkhausen noise in steel. Acta Materialia, 2000, vol. 48 (13), pp. 3545–3551. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00134-8.
  29. Rautioaho R., Karjalainen P., Moilanen M. Improvement of the Barkhausen noise method for stress evaluation. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 1988, vol. 73 (1), pp. 96–102. DOI: 10.1016/0304-8853(88)90174-6.
  30. Krause T.W., Pulfer N., Weymann P., Atherton D.L. Magnetic Barkhausen noise: stress-dependent mechanisms in steel. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1996, vol. 32, is. 5, pp. 4764–4766. DOI: 10.1109/20.539144.
  31. Kleber X., Vincent A. On the Role of Residual Internal Stresses and Dislocations on Barkhausen Noise in Plastically Deformed Steel. NDT & E International, 2004, vol. 37, pp. 439–445. DOI: org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2003.11.008.
  32. Vaidyanathan S., Moorthy V., Kalyanasundaram P. et al. Effect of different stages of tensile deformation on micromagnetic parameters in high-strength, low-alloy steel. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 1999, vol. 30 (8), pp. 2067–2072. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-999-0017-9.
  33. Dhar A., Clapham L., Atherton D.L. Influence of uniaxial plastic deformation on magnetic Barkhausen noise in steel. NDT & E International, 2001, vol. 34, pp. 507–514.
  34. Saquet O., Chicois J., Vincent A. Barkhausen Noise from Plain Carbon Steel. Analysis of the Influence of Microstructure. Materials Science and Engineering, 1999, vol. 269 (A), pp. 73–82. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00155-0.
  35. Bhattacharya D.K., Vaidyanathan S. Effect of the Demagnetisation Factor on the Barkhausen Noise Signal. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 1997, vol. 166, pp. 111–116. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-8853(96)00444-1.
  36. Dubov A.A. Detection of Metallurgical and Production Defects in Engineering Components Using Metal Magnetic Memory. Metallurgist, 2015, vol. 59 (1-2), pp. 164–167. DOI: 10.1007/s11015-015-0078-5.
  37. Dong L., Xu B., Dong S. et al. Stress dependence of the spontaneous stray field signals of ferromagnetic steel. NDT & E International, 2009, vol. 42 (4), pp. 323–327. DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.12.005.
  38. Yao K., Wang Z.D., Deng B., Shen K. Experimental Research on Metal Magnetic Memory Method. Experimental Mechanics, 2011, vol. 52 (3), pp. 305–314. DOI: 10.1007/s11340-011-9490-3.
  39. Changliang S., Shiyun D., Binshi X., Peng H. Stress concentration degree affects spontaneous magnetic signals of ferromagnetic steel under dynamic tension load. NDT & E International, 2010, vol. 43 (1), pp. 8–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.08.002.
  40. Leng J., Xu M., Xu M., Zhang J. Magnetic field variation induced by cyclic bending stress. NDT & E International, 2009, vol. 42 (5), pp. 410–414. DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.01.008.
  41. Wilson J.W., Tian G.Y., Barrans S. Numerical simulation on magnetic flux leakage evaluation at high speed. Sensors and Actuators: Physical A, 2007, vol. 135 (2), pp. 381–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.10.006.
  42. Roskosz M., Gawrilenko P. Analysis of changes in residual magnetic field in loaded notched samples. NDT & E International, 2008, vol. 41 (7), pp. 570–576. DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.04.002.
  43. Lednev I.S. Magnetic methods of non-destructive testing of aircraft parts. Aviation materials and technologies, 2024, no. 1 (74), paper no. 09. Available at: http://www.journal.viam.ru (accessed: December 11, 2024). DOI: 10.18577/2713-0193-2024-0-1-111-120.
  44. Skorobogatko D.S., Golovkov A.N., Kudinov I.I., Knyazev A.V. Comparison of the surface free energy of alloys most commonly used in the aviation industry, using the interaction method Owens–Wendt–Rabel–Kaelble (OWRK). Aviation materials and technologies, 2024, no. 4 (77), paper no. 11. Available at: http://www.journal.viam.ru (accessed: December 11, 2024). DOI: 10.18577/2713-0193-2024-0-4-169-179.
  45. Boychuk A.S., Dikov I.A., Generalov A.S., Slavin A.V. Automated non-destructive inspection of three-layer honeycomb structures’ samples by ultrasonic through-transmission technique. Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii, 2020, no. 2 (59), pp. 74–80. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2020-0-2-74-80.
  46. Krasnov I.S., Lozhkova D.S., Dalin M.A. Evaluation of deficiency of titanium alloy forgings for probabilistic calculation of gas turbine engine disks fracture risk. Aviation materials and technologies, 2021, no. 2 (63), paper no. 12. Available at: https://www.journal.viam.ru (accessed: December 11, 2024). DOI: 10.18577/2713-0193-2021-0-2-115-122.
  47. Kablov E.N., Antipov V.V. The role of new generation materials in ensuring the technological sovereignty of the Russian Federation. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 2023, vol. 93, no. 10, pp. 907–916.
  48. Kablov E.N., Evgenov A.G., Petrushin N.V., Bazyleva O.A., Mazalov I.S. New generation materials and digital additive technologies for the production of resource parts of FSUE VIAM. Part 4. Development of heat-resistant materials. Elektrometallurgiya, 2022, no. 5, pp. 8–19.
  49. Kablov E.N., Babashov V.G., Balinova Yu.A., Maksimov V.G. Phase transformations in a composite material with an organic matrix filled with zirconium dioxide fibers. Teplofizika vysokikh temperatur, 2021, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 62–68.
  50. Kablov E.N., Chainikova A.S., Schegoleva N.E., Grashchenkov D.V., Kovaleva V.S., Belyanchikov I.O. Synthesis, structure, and properties of aluminosilicate glass ceramics modified with zirconium oxide. Neorganicheskie materialy, 2020, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 1123–1129.