Kinetics of anomalous fracture of a titanium alloy sample

Grinevich A.V., Sibayev I.G., Naprienko S.A., Kashapov O.S., Kalashnikov V.S.
Grinevich A.V., Sibayev I.G., Naprienko S.A., Kashapov O.S., Kalashnikov V.S. Kinetics of anomalous fracture of a titanium alloy sample // Proceedings of VIAM. 2026. No. 5. DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2026-0-5-145-158. URL: https://test.viam.ru/en/journal/2026/5/12
Keywords
strength, ductility, brittle fracture, stress intensity factor, titanium alloy, anomalous fracture
Abstract

When evaluating the mechanical characteristics of stamping titanium alloy VT46 of the Ti–Al–Sn–Zr–β-stabilizers system, researchers encountered anomalous fracture of a titanium sample during a standard tensile test. The anomaly of the destruction is that it occurred by a brittle mechanism in the area of the forming neck during general plastic deformation. An assessment of the stress intensity factor at the site of brittle fracture revealed that crack-like defect size is insufficient for the brittle mechanism of crack development under the action of accumulated energy in the loading system. The authors of the study put forward the hypothesis about the formation of an enlarged brittle region (static growth of a crack-like defect) during plastic deformation, which leads to fracture by a macrobrittle tearing mechanism.

Reference list
  1. Fridman Ya.B. Mechanical Properties of Metals. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1974, 840 p.
  2. Cherepanov G.P. Fracture Mechanics. Moscow; Izhevsk: Institute of Computer Research, 2012, 872 p.
  3. Kashapov O.S., Pavlova T.V., Kalashnikov V.S., Kondrateva A.R. Research of influence of alloying elements content on properties of high strength near alpha heat resistance titanium alloy VT46. Trudy VIAM, 2016, no. 9, pp. 44–52. Available at: http://www.viam-works.ru (accessed: October 03, 2025). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2016-0-9-6-6.
  4. Solonin O.P., Glazunov S.G. Modern heat-resistant titanium alloys and prospects for their application in engines. Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1974, 448 p.
  5. Radecka A., Bagot P.A.J., Martin T.L. et al. The formation of ordered clusters in Ti–7Al and Ti–6Al–4V. Acta Materialia, 2016, no. 112, pp. 141–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.080.
  6. Sperry R., Han S., Chen Z. et al. Comparison of EBSD, DIC, AFM, and ECCI for active slip system identification in deformed Ti–7Al. Materials Characterization, 2021, no. 173 (110941), pp. 1–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2021.110941.
  7. Acar P., Ramazani A., Sundararaghavan V. Crystal Plasticity Modeling and Experimental Validation with an Orientation Distribution Function for Ti–7Al Alloy. Metals, 2017, no. 7 (459), pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.3390/met7110459.
  8. Venkataraman A., Shade P., Adebisi R. et al. Study of Structure and Deformation Pathways in Ti–7Al Using Atomistic Simulations, Experiments, and Characterization. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions: A, 2017, vol. 48, pp. 2222–2236. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-017-4024-y.
  9. Lim R.E. Effects of Anisotropy in Polycrystalline Ti–7Al Using Far-Field High Energy X-Ray Diffraction Microscopy: Thesis of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University, 2020, 107 p. URL: https://kilthub.cmu.edu/articles/thesis/Effects_of_Anisotropy_in_Polycrystalline_Ti-7Al_Using_Far-Field_High_Energy_X-Ray_Diffraction_Microscopy/14618439 (accessed: October 03, 2025).
  10. Adebisi R.A., Sathish S., Pilchak A.L., Shade P.A. Elastic constants of α Ti–7Al measured using resonant ultrasound spectroscopy. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2025, vol. 1706, p. 070005. DOI: 10.1063/1.4940523.
  11. Radecka A., Coakley J., Jones I. et al. Ordering and the micromechanics of Ti–7Al. Materials Science & Engineering A, 2015, vol. MSA32796, pp. 1–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.09.070.
  12. Xu Y., Worsnop F., Dye D., Dunne F. Slip intermittency and dwell fatigue in titanium alloys: a discrete dislocation plasticity analysis. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2023, vol. 179, pp. 1–32. URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.05316 (accessed: October 03, 2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2023.105384.
  13. Chatterjeea K., Ko J.Y.P., Weiss J.T. et al. Study of residual stresses in Ti–7Al using theory and experiments. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2017, no. 109, pp. 95–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2017.08.008.
  14. Lim R.E., Pagan D.C., Boyce D.E. et al. Grain-resolved temperature-dependent anisotropy in hexagonal Ti–7Al revealed by synchrotron X-ray diffraction. Materials Characterization, 2021, no. 174 (110943), pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2021.110943.
  15. Acar P. Uncertainty Quantification for Ti–7Al Alloy Microstructure with an Inverse Analytical Model (AUQLin). Materials, 2019, no. 12 (1773), pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.3390/ma12111773.
  16. Erak A.D., Kiselev A.S. Correlation between fracture toughness parameters and fracture surfaces structure parameters for three-point bending tests. Aviation materials and technologies, 2023, no. 2 (71), pp. 156–166. Available at: http://www.journal.viam.ru (accessed: October 03, 2025). DOI: 10.18577/2713-0193-2023-0-2-156-166.
  17. Monakhov A.D., Yakovlev N.O. Application of the deep learning method in studying crack resistance characteristics. Trudy VIAM, 2024, no. 6 (136), pp. 80‒91. Available at: http://www.viam-works.ru (accessed: October 03, 2025). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2024-0-6-80-91.
  18. Sutubalov A.I., Podzhivotov N.Yu., Shershak P.V., Yakovlev N.O. Evaluation of homogeneity of physical and mechanical properties of semi-finished products for aviation purpose. Aviation materials and technologies, 2024, no. 1 (74), pp. 121–135. Available at: http://www.journal.viam.ru (accessed: October 03, 2025). DOI: 10.18577/2713-0193-2024-0-1-121-135.
  19. Gorbovets M.A., Khodinev I.A., Monin S.A. Tests of structural metallic materials for the fatigue crack growth rate in a corrosive environment (review). Trudy VIAM, 2022, no. 12 (118), pp. 135–144. Available at: http://www.viam-works.ru (accessed: October 14, 2025). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2022-0-12-135-144.
  20. Prokhodtseva L.V., Naprienko S.A. Features of destruction of titanium alloy VT41 in different structural states under static and dynamic loading. Deformatsiya i razrushenie materialov, 2014, no. 2, pp. 42–47.
  21. Chabina E.B., Alekseev A.A., Filonova E.V., Lukina E.A. Application of methods of analytical microscopy and X-ray of the structural analysis for research of structural and phase condition of materials. Trudy VIAM, 2013, no. 5, pp. 29–35. Available at: http://www.viam-works.ru (accessed: September 24, 2025).
  22. Grigorenko V.B., Morozova L.V. Application of the scanning electron microscopy for studying of initial destruction stages. Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii, 2018, no. 1 (50), pp. 77–87. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2018-0-1-77-87.
  23. Zheng Z., Balint D.S., Dunne F.P.E. Investigation of slip transfer across HCP grain boundaries with application to cold dwell facet fatigue. Acta Materialia, 2017, no. 127, pp. 43–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.01.021.
  24. Stinville J.C., Ludwig W., Callahan P.G. et al. Observation of bulk plasticity in a polycrystalline titanium alloy by diffraction contrast tomography and topotomography. Materials Characterization, 2022, no. 188, pp. 1–24.
  25. Wielewski E., Arthington M., Siviour C., Petrinic N. Characterising the Effects of Strain Rate, Crystallographic Texture and Direction of Loading on the Mechanical Behaviour of Ti–6Al–4V. Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials, 2015, no. 1, pp. 462–471. DOI: 10.1007/s40870-015-0040-4.
  26. Zang K., Yang K.V., Lim S. et al. Effect of the presence of macrozones on short crack propagation in forged two-phase titanium alloys. International Journal of Fatigue, 2017, no. 104, pp. 1–11.