The analysis and comparison of the RF and foreign standards for method of thermomechanical fatigue tests

Gorbovets M.A., Kochetkov D.A., Khodinev I.A.
UDC
004.057.2:620.1
DOI
10.18577/2307-6046-2017-0-4-11-11
Article PDF (Russian) (480.52 KB)
How to cite
Gorbovets M.A., Kochetkov D.A., Khodinev I.A. The analysis and comparison of the RF and foreign standards for method of thermomechanical fatigue tests // Proceedings of VIAM. 2017. No. 4. DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2017-0-4-11-11. URL: https://test.viam.ru/en/journal/2017/4/11
Keywords
thermomechanical fatigue, low-cycle fatigue (LCF), TMF testing, strain, fatigue, force-controlled, strain-controlled.
Abstract

This paper analyzes the standards GOST 25.505–85 «Calculations and strength tests. Methods of mechanical testing of metals. Test method for thermomechanical low-cycle fatigue» and ASTME 2368-10 «Practice for Strain Controlled Thermomechanical fatigue testing» to get an idea about specifics of carrying out tests for thermomechanical fatigue and identify differences between these standards.

There are no significant differences between the samples of cylindrical forms and sizes of the working parts. Russian standard specifies necessary requirements for manufacturing precision of working part of sample. Standard ASTME 2368-10 contains more stringent requirements to the accuracy of loading and a more detailed description of the test procedure than GOST 25.505–85. The US standard provides guidance and refers to the practical guidance on calibration of measuring systems.

The existing state standard GOST 25.505–85 needs substantial improvement in accordance with modern requirements.

Work is performed within realization of the complex scientific 2.2. «Qualifications and research of materials» («The strategic directions of development of materials and technologies of their processing for the period till 2030») 

Reference list
  1. Kablov E.N. Innovacionnye razrabotki FGUP «VIAM» GNC RF po realizacii «Strategicheskih napravlenij razvitiya materialov i tehnologij ih pererabotki na period do 2030 goda» [Innovative developments of FSUE «VIAM» SSC of RF on realization of «Strategic directions of the development of materials and technologies of their processing for the period until 2030»] // Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii. 2015. №1 (34). S. 3–33. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2015-0-1-3-33.
  2. Kablov E.N. Strategicheskie napravleniya razvitiya materialov i tehnologij ih pererabotki na period do 2030 goda [The strategic directions of development of materials and technologies of their processing for the period to 2030] // Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii. 2012. №S. S. 7–17.
  3. Kablov E.N. Sovremennye materialy – osnova innovacionnoj modernizacii Rossii [Modern materials is the base of innovative modernization of Russia] // Metally Evrazii. 2012. №3. S. 10–15.
  4. Kablov E.N. Bez novyh materialov – net budushhego [There is no future without new materials] // Metallurg. 2013. №12. S. 4–8.
  5. Petuhov A.N. Soprotivlenie ustalosti detalej GTD [Resistance of fatigue of details of GTE]. M.: Mashinostroenie, 1993. 240 s.
  6. Kablov E.N. Materialy i tehnologii VIAM dlya «Aviadvigatelya» [Materials and technologies by VIAM for « Aviadvigatel»] // Permskie aviacionnye dvigateli: inform. byul. 2014. №31. S. 43–47.
  7. Belyaev M.S., Terentev V.F., Gorbovec M.A., Bakradze M.M., Goldberg M.A. Malociklovaya ustalost pri zadannoj deformacii i parametry uprugoplasticheskogo deformirovaniya zharoprochnogo splava VZh175 [Low-cycle fatigue for a given deformation and parameters of elastic-plastic deformation of superalloy VZh175] // Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii. 2014. №S4. S. 87–92. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2014-0-s4-87-92.
  8. Terentev V.F., Petuhov A.N. Ustalost vysokoprochnyh metallicheskih materialov [Fatigue of high-strength metal materials]. M.: IMET RAN–CIAM, 2013. 515 s.
  9. Erasov V.S., Nuzhnyj G.A. Zhestkij cikl nagruzheniya pri ustalostnyh ispytaniyah [Rigid cycle of loading at fatigue tests] // Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii. 2011. №4. S. 35–40.
  10. Schijve J. Fatigue of structures and materials. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. 2009. 185 p.
  11. Erasov V.S., Yakovlev N.O., Nuzhnyj G.A. Kvalifikatsionnye ispytaniya i issledovaniya prochnosti aviatsionnyh materialov [Qualification tests and researches of durability of aviation materials] // Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii. 2012. №S. S. 440–448.
  12. Beck T., Rau K. Temperature measurement and control methods in TMF testing – a comparison and evaluation// International journal of fatigue. 2008. Vol. 30 (2). P. 226–233.
  13. Lebedev A.A., Kovalchuk B.I., Giginyak F.F., Lamashevskij V.P. Mehanicheskie svojstva konstrukcionnyh materialov pri slozhnom napryazhennom sostoyanii: spravochnik. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. [Mechanical properties of constructional materials at multi-axial stress: directory. 3rd prod., rev. and add.]. Kiev: In Yure, 2003. 539 s.
  14. Nagesha A., Goyal Sunil, Nandagopal M. еt al. Dynamic strain ageing in Inconel Alloy 783 under tension and low cycle fatigue // Material Science and Engineering A. 2012. Vol. 546. P. 34–39.
  15. Inozemcev A.A., Ratchiev A.M., Nihamkin M.Sh. i dr. Malociklovaya ustalost i ciklicheskaya treshhinostojkost nikelevogo splava pri nagruzhenii, harakternom dlya diskov turbin [Low-cyclic fatigue and cyclic cracks resistance of nickel alloy when loading, characteristic for disks of turbines] // Tyazheloe mashinostroenie. 2011. №4. S. 30–33.