Tests of structural metallic materials for the fatigue crack growth rate in a corrosive environment (review)

Gorbovets M.A., Khodinev I.A., Monin S.A.
Gorbovets M.A., Khodinev I.A., Monin S.A. Tests of structural metallic materials for the fatigue crack growth rate in a corrosive environment (review) // Proceedings of VIAM. 2022. No. 12. DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2022-0-12-135-144. URL: https://test.viam.ru/en/journal/2022/12/12
Keywords
fatigue crack growth rate, corrosion, metals, fatigue, aggressive environment, cyclic crack resistance
Abstract

Considers methods for testing steels and alloys for the fatigue crack growth rate when exposed to a corrosive environment. Preferably, these tests are carried out under simultaneous mechanical and corrosion action on compact eccentric tensile specimens. The composition of the environment is determined by the operating conditions of the product. In most cases, NaCl solutions of various concentrations are used. Fatigue crack growth rate is extremely sensitive to the parameters of the test environment and mechanical loading.

Reference list
  1. Industry Standard 1 92127–90. Metals. Method for determining the growth rate of a fatigue crack during tests with a constant load amplitude. Moscow: VILS, 1990. 66 p.
  2. ASTM E647-15e1. Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates. ASTM International, 2016, 49 p.
  3. Kablov E.N. The role of fundamental research in the creation of new generation materials. Report of XXI Mendeleev Congress on General and Applied Chemistry: in 6 vols. St. Petersburg, 2019, vol. 4, p. 24.
  4. Lutsenko A.N., Slavin A.V., Erasov V.S., Khvackij K.K. Strength tests and researches of aviation materials. Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii, 2017, no. S, pp. 527–546. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2017-0-S-527-546.
  5. Abramova M.G. Revisiting the confirmation of the identity of the corrosion destruction mechanism of aluminum alloys (review). Part 2. Corrosion in sea water. Aviation materials and technology, 2021, no. 1 (62). paper no. 09. Available at: http://www.journal.viam.ru (accessed: June 21, 2022). DOI: 10.18577/2713-0193-2021-0-1-95-103.
  6. Abramova M.G., Lutsenko A.N., Varchenko E.A. Concerning the aspects of validation of climate resistance of airborne materials at all life cycle stages (review). Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii, 2020, no. 1 (58), pp. 86–94. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2020-0-1-86-94.
  7. Kablov E.N., Kutyrev A.E., Vdovin A.I., Kozlov I.A., Afanasyev-Khodykin A.N. The research of possibility of galvanic corrosion in brazed connections used in aviation engine construction. Aviation materials and technologies, 2021, no. 4 (65), paper no. 01. Available at: http://www.journal.viam.ru (accessed: June 21, 2022). DOI: 10.18577/2713-0193-2021-0-4-3-13.
  8. Vetrova E.Yu., Shchekin V.K., Kurs M.G. Comparative evaluation of methods for the determination of corrosion aggressivity of the atmosphere. Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii, 2019, no. 1 (54), pp. 74–81. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2019-0-1-74-81.
  9. Grinevich A.V., Yakovlev N.O., Skripachev S.Yu., Nuzhny G.A. Corrosion cracking of steels of various strengths under conditions of constant crack opening. Deformatsiya i razrusheniye materialov, 2019, no. 1, pp. 43–48.
  10. Grinevich A.V., Lutsenko A.N., Erasov V.S., Nuzhny G.A. A technique for assessing fracture toughness in a corrosive environment under long-term static load. Zavodskaya laboratoriya. Diagnostika materialov, 2017, vol. 83, no. 9, pp. 52–56.
  11. Lutsenko A.N., Grinevich A.V., Karimova S.A. Strength characteristics of aircraft airframe materials under humid conditions. Voprosy materialovedeniya, 2013, no. 1 (73), pp. 212–219.
  12. Kablov E.N. Innovative developments of FSUE «VIAM» SSC of RF on realization of «Strategic directions of the development of materials and technologies of their processing for the period until 2030». Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii, 2015, no. 1 (34), pp. 3–33. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2015-0-1-3-33.
  13. Erasov V.S., Oreshko E.I. Reasons for dependence of mechanical characteristics of material fracture resistance on sample sizes. Aviaсionnye materialy i tehnologii, 2018, no. 3, pp. 56–64. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2018-0-3-56-64.
  14. Kang D.H., Lee J.K., Kim T.W. Corrosion fatigue crack propagation of high-strength steel HSB800 in a seawater environment. Procedia Engineering, 2010, pp. 1170–1175. DOI: 0.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.195.
  15. Arunachalam S., Fawaz S. Test method for corrosion pit-to-fatigue crack transition from a corner of hole in 7075-T651 aluminum alloy. International Journal of Fatigue, 2016, no. 98, pp. 50–58.
  16. Bogar F.D., Crooker T.W. Effects of Natural Seawater and Electrochemical Potential on Fatigue-Crack Growth in 5086 and 5456 Aluminum Alloys: NRL Report 8153. Washington, DC: Department of Defense, Navy Department, Office of Naval Research, Naval Research Laboratory, 1977, 14 p.
  17. Vosikovsky O. Effects of Mechanical and Environmental Variableson Fatigue Crack Growth Rates in Steel. A Summary of Work DoneAt CANMET. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 1980, vol. 19, pp. 87–97.
  18. Guo Y., Shao Y., Gao X. et al. Corrosion fatigue crack growth of serviced API 5L X56 submarine pipeline. Ocean Engineering, 2022, no. 256, art. 111502.
  19. Laptev A.B., Zakirova L.I. Zagorskikh O.A., Pavlov M.R. Methods of investigation of the processes of corrosion-mechanical destruction and hydrogenation of metals (review). Part 1. Investigation of corrosion-mechanical destruction of steels. Trudy VIAM, 2022, no. 4 (110), paper no. 12. Available at: http://www.viam-works.ru (accessed: June 21, 2022). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2022-0-4-118-130.
  20. A kind of difference seawater velocity Corrosion Fatigue Crack Propagation rate prediction method: pat. CN 110489848 A; filed 12.08.19; publ. 11.12.20.
  21. Method for assessing the corrosion fatigue resistance of welded joints: pat. 2485483 Rus. Federation; filed 10.01.12; publ. 20.06.13.
  22. Device for corrosion and fatigue test: pat. ES 2393491 В1; filed 29.04.11; publ. 29.10.13.
  23. Large-scale model corrosion fatigue test system and method for ocean engineering structure: pat. CN 112924369 A; filed 27.01.21; publ. 08.06.21.
  24. A kind of steel bridge deck corrosion fatigue coupling test method and device thereof: pat. CN 110361318 A; filed 04.06.19; publ. 01.09.20.
  25. Apparatus for testing corrosion fatigue life of automotive chassis parts: pat. KR 20080103124; filed. 23.05.07; publ. 27.11.08.
  26. Barsom J.M. Effects of Cyclic Stress Form on Corrosion Fatigue Crack Propagation Below KIscc in a High Yield Strength Steel. Corrosion Fatigue: Chemistry, Mechanics and Microstructure, 1972, pp. 424–433.
  27. Selines R.J., Pelloux R.M. Effect of Cyclic Stress Wave Form on Corrosion Fatigue Crack Propagation in Al–Zn–Mg Alloys. Metallurgical Transactions, 1972, vol. 3, pp. 2525–2531.
  28. Dawson D.B., Pelloux R.M. Corrosion Fatigue Crack Growth in Titanium Alloys in Aqueous Environments. Metallurgical Transactions, 1974, vol. 5, pp. 723–731.
  29. Menan F., Henaff G. Influence of frequency and waveform on corrosion fatigue crack propagation in the 2024–1351 aluminium alloy in the S–L orientation. Materials Science and Engineering, 2009, pp. 70–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.04.058.
  30. Andersson С., Liu J. Effect of corrosion on the low cycle fatigue behavior of Sn–4.0 Ag–0.5 Cu lead-free solder joints. International Journal of Fatigue, 2008, vol. 30 (5), pp. 917–930. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.06.009.
  31. Mukahiwa K., Scenini F., Burke M.G. et al. Corrosion fatigue and microstructural characterization of Type 316 austenitic stainless steels tested in PWR primary water. Corrosion Science, 2017, pp. 57–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2017.10.022.
  32. Karpenko O., Oterkus S., Oterkus E. Titanium alloy corrosion fatigue crack growth rates prediction: Peridynamics based numerical approach. International Journal of Fatigue, 2022, no. 162, art. 107023.
  33. Liao X., Li Y., Qiang B. et al. An improved crack growth model of corrosion fatigue for steel in artificial seawater. International Journal of Fatigue, 2022, no. 160, art. 106882.