Application of functional and adaptive materials obtained by 3D printing (review)

Kablov E.N., Kondrashov S.V., Melnikov A.A., Schur P.A.
UDC
678.8
DOI
10.18577/2307-6046-2022-0-2-32-51
Article PDF (Russian) (1.47 MB)
How to cite
Kablov E.N., Kondrashov S.V., Melnikov A.A., Schur P.A. Application of functional and adaptive materials obtained by 3D printing (review) // Proceedings of VIAM. 2022. No. 2. DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2022-0-2-32-51. URL: https://test.viam.ru/en/journal/2022/2/3
Keywords
FDM printing, 3D printing, polymer materials with shape memory, actuators, sensors made of polymer materials, polymer sensors for various purposes
Abstract

Based on a review of scientific and technical literature, the main directions of using functional materials obtained by the FDM printing method in the development of sensors for various purposes and polymer actuators are identified. It is shown that to date, significant progress has been achieved in the field of printing sensors for various purposes: materials have been selected, a conceptual appearance of products has been developed, their characteristics have been investigated. The possibilities of using polymeric materials with shape memory for the manufacture of actuators obtained by the 3D printing method are demonstrated. It is noted that the uniqueness of this method of manufacturing actuators is associated with the ability to lay the stress diagram necessary for the operation of the device during the printing process.

Reference list
  1. Kablov E.N. Present and future of additive technologies. Metally Evrazii, 2017, no. 1, pp. 2–6.
  2. Onishchenko G.G., Kablov E.N., Ivanov V.V. Scientific and technological development of Russia in the context of achieving national goals: problems and solutions. Innovatsii, 2020, no. 6 (260), pp. 3–16.
  3. Kablov E.N. New Generation Materials and Technologies for Their Digital Processing. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2020, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 225–228.
  4. Pavlyuk B.Ph. The main directions in the field of development of polymeric functional materials. Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii, 2017, no. S, pp. 388–392. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2017-0-S-388-392.
  5. Terekhov I.V., Shlenskiy V.A., Kurshev E.V., Lonskiy S.L., Dyatlov V.A. Researches of factors affecting the formation of epoxy-containing microcapsules for the self-healing compositions. Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii, 2018, no. 3 (52), pp. 27–34. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2018-0-3-27-34.
  6. Elinson V.M., Shchur P.A., Uvarov S.I. Formation of antimicrobial carbon and fluorocarbon coatings using predictive modeling of their properties. High Temperature Material Processes: An International Quarterly of High-Technology Plasma Processes, 2021, vol. 4, pp. 17–23. DOI: 10.1615/HighTempMatProc. 2021041784.
  7. Perov N.S. Design of polymeric materials on the molecular principles. II. The molecu-lar mobility in the cross-linked complex systems. Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii, 2017, no. 4 (49), pp. 30–36. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2017-0-4-30-36.
  8. Tkachuk A.I., Terekhov I.V., Gurevich Ya.M., Kudryavtseva A.N. Application of bismaleimide VST-57 binder for obtaining heat-resistant dimensionally stable molds from polymer composite materials. Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii, 2020, no. 2 (59), pp. 32–40. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2020-0-2-32-40.
  9. Kondrashov S.V., Pykhtin A.A., Larionov S.A. FDM-printed functional materials (review). Trudy VIAM, 2021, no. 3 (97), paper no. 04. Available at: http://viam-works.ru (accessed: September 4, 2021). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2021-0-3-44-57.
  10. All about sensors, measuring instruments. Available at: https://osensorax.ru (accessed: September 25, 2021).
  11. Khosravani M.R., Reinicke T. Applications of additive manufacturing in fabrication of sensors – A review. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2020, vol. 111916.
  12. Christ J.F., Hohimer C.J., Aliheidari N. et al. 3D printing of highly elastic strain sensors using polyurethane/multiwall carbon nanotube composites. Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems, 2017, vol. 10168, pp. 101680E.
  13. Xiang D., Zhang X., Li Y. et al. Enhanced performance of 3D printed highly elastic strain sensors of carbon nanotube/thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites via non-covalent interactions. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, vol. 176, pp. 107250.
  14. Beckwith T.G., Marangoni R.D., Lienhard J.H. Mechanical measurements. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1995, vol. 5, 345 p.
  15. Xiang D., Zhang X., Harkin-Jones E. et al. Synergistic effects of hybrid conductive nanofillers on the performance of 3D printed highly elastic strain sensors. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2020, vol. 129, pp. 105730.
  16. Lin L., Liu S., Zhang Q. et al. Towards tunable sensitivity of electrical property to strain for conductive polymer composites based on thermoplastic elastomer. ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2013, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 5815–5824.
  17. Taherkhani B., Azizkhani M.B., Kadkhodapour J. et al. Highly sensitive, piezoresistive, silicone/carbon fiber-based auxetic sensor for low strain values. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2020, vol. 305, pp. 111939.
  18. Ali M.M., Maddipatla D., Narakathu B.B. et al. Printed strain sensor based on silver nanowire/silver flake composite on flexible and stretchable TPU substrate. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2018, vol. 274, pp. 109–115.
  19. Kwok S.W., Goh K.H.H., Tan Z.D. et al. Electrically conductive filament for 3D-printed circuits and sensors. Applied Materials Today, 2017, vol. 9, pp. 167–175.
  20. Tarbuttona J., Leb T., Helfrichb G. et al. Phase transformation and shock sensor response of additively manufactured piezoelectric PVDF. Procedia Manufacturing, 2017, vol. 10, pp. 982–989.
  21. Leigh S.J., Bradley R.J., Purssell C.P. et al. A simple, low-cost conductive composite material for 3D printing of electronic sensors. PloS one, 2012, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. e49365.
  22. Shemelya C., Cedillos F., Aguilera E. et al. Encapsulated copper wire and copper mesh capacitive sensing for 3D printing applications. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2014, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1280–1286.
  23. Kim K., Park J., Suh J.H. et al. 3D printing of multiaxial force sensors using carbon nanotube (CNT)/thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) filaments. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2017, vol. 263, pp. 493–500.
  24. Yang Y., Hong C., Abro Z.A. et al. A new Fiber Bragg Grating sensor based circumferential strain sensor fabricated using 3D printing method. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2019, vol. 295, pp. 663–670.
  25. Hong C., Yuan Y., Yang Y. et al. A simple FBG pressure sensor fabricated using fused deposition modelling process. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2019, vol. 285, pp. 269–274.
  26. Leigh S.J., Purssell C.P., Billson D.R. et al. Using a magnetite/thermoplastic composite in 3D printing of direct replacements for commercially available flow sensors. Smart materials and structures, 2014, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 095039.
  27. Bulat P. On the way to the fifth and sixth generation. Part VI. Available at: http://otvaga2004.ru/kaleydoskop/kaleydoskop-air/5-6-pokoleniye-6/ (accessed: September 25, 2021).
  28. Larionova A.V., Chumak P.I. Progress in the design and manufacture of small-sized wind turbines. Russian civilization: past, present and future P76. Collection Scientific works of III Scientific-Practical Conf. Stavropol: Mir dannykh, 2010, pp. 356–358.
  29. Sogokon A.B. Why do you need a solar energy concentrator? Or what is a solar concentrator capable of?. Scientific-practical conf. "Energy and resource efficiency of low-rise residential buildings" (Novosibirsk, March 19–20, 2013). Novosibirsk: Institute of Thermal Physics SB RAS, 2013, pp. 19–20.
  30. Momeni F., Ni J. Nature-inspired smart solar concentrators by 4D printing. Renewable Energy, 2018, vol. 122, pp. 35–44.
  31. Bacha C.B., Bourbia F. Effect of kinetic facades on energy efficiency in office buildings-hot dry climates. 11th Conference on advanced building skins, 2016, vol. 1, pp. 458–468.
  32. Yi H., Kim D., Kim Y. et al. 3D-printed attachable kinetic shading device with alternate actuation: Use of shape-memory alloy (SMA) for climate-adaptive responsive architecture. Automation in Construction, 2020, vol. 114, pp. 103151.
  33. Joshi S., Rawat K., Karunakaran C. et al. 4D printing of materials for the future: opportunities and challenges. Applied Materials Today, 2020, vol. 18, pp. 100490.
  34. Zolfagharian A., Kouzani A.Z., Khoo S.Y. et al. Evolution of 3D printed soft actuators. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2016, vol. 250, pp. 258–272.
  35. Pinho A.C., Buga C.S., Piedade A.P. The chemistry behind 4D printing. Applied Materials Today, 2020, vol. 19, pp. 100611.
  36. Hu J., Zhu Y., Huang H. et al. Recent advances in shape-memory polymers: Structure, mechanism, functionality, modeling and applications. Progress in Polymer Science, 2012, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1720–1763.
  37. Beloshenko V.A., Varyukhin V.N., Vozniak Yu.V. Shape memory effect in polymers. Uspekhi khimii, 2005, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 285–306.
  38. Hu J., Chen S. A review of actively moving polymers in textile applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2010, vol. 20, no. 17, pp. 3346–3355.
  39. Ge Q., Dunn C.K., Qi H.J. et al. Active origami by 4D printing. Smart Materials and Structures, 2014, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 094007.
  40. Ge Q., Qi H.J., Dunn M.L. Active materials by four-dimension printing. Applied Physics Letters, 2013, vol. 103, no. 13, pp. 131901.
  41. Yu K., Ritchie A., Mao Y. et al. Controlled sequential shape changing components by 3D printing of shape memory polymer multimaterials. Procedia Iutam, 2015, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 193–203.
  42. Liu Y., Boyles J.K., Genzer J. et al. Self-folding of polymer sheets using local light absorption. Soft matter, 2012, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1764–1769.
  43. Akbari S., Sakhaei A.H., Kowsari K. et al. Enhanced multimaterial 4D printing with active hinges. Smart Materials and Structures, 2018, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 065027.
  44. Ding Z., Yuan C., Peng X. et al. Direct 4D printing via active composite materials. Science advances, 2017, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. e1602890.
  45. Wu J., Yuan C., Ding Z. et al. Multi-shape active composites by 3D printing of digital shape memory polymers. Scientific reports, 2016, vol. 6, pp. 24224.
  46. Mao Y., Ding Z., Yuan C. et al. 3D printed reversible shape changing components with stimuli responsive materials. Scientific reports, 2016, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–13.
  47. Yuan C., Roach D.J., Dunn C.K. et al. 3D printed reversible shape changing soft actuators assisted by liquid crystal elastomers. Soft Matter, 2017, vol. 13, no. 33, pp. 5558–5568.
  48. Beyer P., Terentjev E.M., Zentel R. Monodomain liquid crystal main chain elastomers by photocrosslinking. Macromolecular rapid communications, 2007, vol. 28, no. 14, pp. 1485–1490.
  49. Ahir S.V., Tajbakhsh A.R., Terentjev E.M. Self assembled shape memory fibers of triblock liquid crystal polymers. Advanced Functional Materials, 2006, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 556–560.
  50. Thermoplastic elastomers. Fundamentals of plastics processing technology. Ed. V.N. Kuleznev and V.K. Gusev. Moscow: Khimiya, 2004. Available at: mplast.by/encyklopedia/termoelastoplastyi/ (accessed: September 25, 2021).
  51. Shape Memory Polymer. Available at: http://www2.smptechno.com/en/smp/ (accessed: September 25, 2021).
  52. Yang Y., Chen Y., Wei Y. et al. 3D printing of shape memory polymer for functional part fabrication. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, vol. 84, no. 9–12, pp. 2079–2095.
  53. Liu Y., Zhang W., Zhang F. et al. Shape memory behavior and recovery force of 4D printed laminated Miura-origami structures subjected to compressive loading. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2018, vol. 153, pp. 233–242.
  54. Bodaghi M., Damanpack A.R., Liao W.H. Adaptive metamaterials by functionally graded 4D printing. Materials & Design, 2017, vol. 135, pp. 26–36.
  55. Kondrashov S.V., Pykhtin A.A., Larionov S.A. et al. Influence of production modes on the structure and properties of polyethylene samples produced by FDM-printing. Vse materialy. Entsiklopedicheskiy spravochnik, 2021, no. 2, pp. 30–36.
  56. Van Manen T., Janbaz S., Zadpoor A.A. Programming 2D/3D shape-shifting with hobbyist 3D printers. Materials horizons, 2017, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1064–1069.
  57. Ly S.T., Kim J.Y. 4D printing-fused deposition modeling printing with thermal-responsive shape memory polymers. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 2017, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 267–272.
  58. Zarek M., Layani M., Cooperstein I. et al. 3D printing of shape memory polymers for flexible electronic devices. Advanced Materials, 2016, vol. 28, no. 22, pp. 4449–4454.
  59. Liu Y., Zhang W., Zhang F. et al. Microstructural design for enhanced shape memory behavior of 4D printed composites based on carbon nanotube/polylactic acid filament. Composites Science and Technology, 2019, vol. 181, pp. 107692.
  60. Song S.H., Lee J.Y., Rodrigue H. et al. 35 Hz shape memory alloy actuator with bending-twisting mode. Scientific reports, 2016, vol. 6, pp. 21118.
  61. Yang C., Boorugu M., Dopp A. et al. 4D printing reconfigurable, deployable and mechanically tunable metamaterials. Materials Horizons, 2019, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1244–1250.
  62. Kang M., Pyo Y., Young Jang J. et al. Design of a shape memory composite (SMC) using 4D printing technology. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2018, vol. 283, pp. 187–195.
  63. Akbari S., Sakhaei A.H., Panjwani S. et al. Multimaterial 3D printed soft actuators powered by shape memory alloy wires. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2019, vol. 290, pp. 177–189.
  64. Umedachi T., Trimmer B.A. Design of a 3D-printed soft robot with posture and steering control. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2014, pp. 2874–2879.