Review of criteria of durability of materials

Oreshko E.I., Erasov V.S., Grinevich A.V., Shershak P.V.
UDC
66.017:620.1
DOI
10.18577/2307-6046-2019-0-9-108-126
Article PDF (Russian) (1.29 MB)
How to cite
Oreshko E.I., Erasov V.S., Grinevich A.V., Shershak P.V. Review of criteria of durability of materials // Proceedings of VIAM. 2019. No. 9. DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2019-0-9-108-126. URL: https://test.viam.ru/en/journal/2019/9/12
Keywords
strength, strength criteria, failure, composite materials, calculation, finite element method.
Abstract

In work the analysis of various criteria of durability for isotropic, orthotropic and anisotropic materials is carried out. Applied approaches are described at calculation of durability of fibrous and layered composite materials. Criteria are considered: Mises, Pisarenko–Lebedev, William–Warnke, Drucker–Prager, Bazant, Norris, Cunze, Goldenblat–Kopnov, Tsai–Hill, Tsai–Wu, Hashin, LaRC, Hoffman, Puck, criteria of durability sandwich of panels, etc. The review of strength criteria of the materials used in the ANSYS Mechanical APDL program is presented.

Reference list
  1. Kablov E.N. Innovacionnye razrabotki FGUP «VIAM» GNC RF po realizacii «Strategicheskih napravlenij razvitiya materialov i tehnologij ih pererabotki na period do 2030 goda» [Innovative developments of FSUE «VIAM» SSC of RF on realization of «Strategic directions of the development of materials and technologies of their processing for the period until 2030»] // Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii. 2015. №1 (34). S. 3–33. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2015-0-1-3-33.
  2. Kablov E.N. Kompozity: segodnya i zavtra [Composites: today and tomorrow] // Metally Evrazii. 2015. №1. S. 36–39.
  3. Buznik V.M., Kablov E.N., Koshurina A.A. Materialy dlya slozhnykh tekhnicheskikh ustroystv arkticheskogo primeneniya [Materials for complex technical devices of the Arctic application] // Nauchno-tekhnicheskiye problemy osvoyeniya Arktiki. M.: Nauka, 2015. S. 275–285.
  4. Erasov V.S., Oreshko E.I. Koeffitsient Puassona i puassonova sila [Poisson ratio and poisson force] // Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii. 2018. №4 (53). S. 79–86. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2018-0-4-79-86.
  5. Erasov V.S., Avtaev V.V., Oreshko E.I., Yakovlev N.O. Preimushchestva «zhestkogo» nagruzheniya pri ispytaniyakh na staticheskoe i povtorno-staticheskoe rastyazhenie [Strain-controlled testing advantages at static tension and repeated-static tension] // Trudy VIAM: elektron. nauch.-tekhnich. zhurn. 2018. №9 (69). St. 10. Available at: http://www.viam-works.ru (accessed: August 25, 2019). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2018-0-9-92-104.
  6. Erasov V.S., Oreshko E.I. Deformaciya i razrushenie kak processy izmeneniya obema, ploshhadi poverhnosti i linejnyh razmerov v nagruzhaemyh telah [Deformation and destruction as processes of change of volume, the areas of a surface and the linear sizes in loaded bodies] // Trudy VIAM: elektron. nauch.-tehnich. zhurn. 2016. №8. St. 11. Available at: http://www.viam-works.ru (accessed: August 25, 2019). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2016-0-8-11-11.
  7. Erasov V.S., Oreshko E.I., Lucenko A.N. Ploshhad svobodnoj poverhnosti kak kriterij hrupkogo razrusheniya [Area of a free surface as criterion of brittle fracture] // Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii. 2017. № 2 (47). S. 69–79. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2017-0-2-69-79.
  8. Erasov V.S., Oreshko E.I. Silovoj, deformacionnyj i energeticheskij kriterii razrusheniya [Force, deformation and energy criteria of destruction] // Trudy VIAM: elektron. nauch.-tehnich. zhurn. 2017. №10 (58). St. 11. Available at: http://viam-works.ru (accessed: August 25, 2019). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2017-0-10-11-11.
  9. Erasov V.S., Oreshko E.I., Lutsenko A.N. Obrazovanie novykh poverkhnostey v tverdom tele na stadiyakh uprugoy i plasticheskoy deformatsiy, nachala i razvitiya razrusheniya [Formation of new surfaces in a firm body at stages of elastic and plastic deformations, the beginning and destruction development] // Trudy VIAM: elektron. nauch.-tekhnich. zhurn. 2018. №2 (62). St. 12. Available at: http://www.viam-works.ru (accessed: August 25, 2019). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2018-0-2-12-12.
  10. Erasov V.S., Oreshko E.I. Prichiny zavisimosti mekhanicheskikh kharakteristik treshchinostoykosti materiala ot razmerov obraztsa [Reasons for dependence of mechanical characteristics of material fracture resistanceon sample sizes] // Aviacionnyye materialy i tehnologii. 2018. №3. S. 56–64. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2018-0-3-56-64.
  11. Stepin P.A. Soprotivleniye materialov: ucheb. [Resistance of materials: textbook]. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1988. 367 s.
  12. Aleksandrov A.V., Potapov V.D., Derzhavin B.P. Soprotivleniye materialov [Resistance of materials]. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 2003. 561 s.
  13. Taranukha N.A. Teoriya uprugosti: ucheb. posobiye [Theory of elasticity: tutotial]. Khabarovsk: Khabarovskiy politekh. in-t, 1992. 87 s.
  14. Ottozen N.S. A Failure Criterion for Concrete // Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division ASCE. 1977. Vol. 103. NEM4. P. 527–535.
  15. Lebedev A.A., Kovalchuk B.I., Giginyak F.F., Lamashevskiy V.P. Mekhanicheskiye svoystva konstruktsionnykh materialov pri slozhnom napryazhennom sostoyanii [Mechanical properties of structural materials under complex stress state]. Kiyev: In Yure, 2003. 540 s.
  16. Westergaard H.M. Plastic state of stress around a deep well // Journal of the Boston Society of Civil Engineers Section,1940. Vol. 27. No. 1. Р. 1–5.
  17. Filonenko-Borodich M.M. Ob usloviyakh prochnosti materialov, obladayushchikh razlichnym soprotivleniyem rastyazheniyu i szhatiyu [On the strength conditions of materials with different tensile and compression resistance] // Inzhenernyy sbornik. 1954. Vyp. 19. S. 36–48.
  18. Pisarenko G.S., Lebedev A.A. Deformirovaniye i prochnost materialov pri slozhnom napryazhennom sostoyanii Deformation and strength of materials under complex stress state. Kiyev: Naukova dumka, 1976. 416 s.
  19. Balan T.A., Spacone E., Kwon M. 3D hypoplastic model for cyclic analysis of concrete structures // Engineering Structures. Elsevier, 2001. No. 23. P. 333–342.
  20. Klovanich S.F., Bezushko D.I. Metod konechnykh elementov v raschetakh prostranstvennykh zhelezobetonnykh konstruktsiy [The finite element method in the calculation of spatial reinforced concrete structures]. Odessa: Izd-vo ONMU, 2009. 89 s.
  21. Kazarinov Yu.I. Prochnost elementov konstruktsiy s vyrezami i povrezhdeniyami: monografiya [Strength of structural elements with cutouts and damage: a monograph]. Tyumen: TIU, 2017. S. 94–95.
  22. Popov A.A., Khatuntsev A.A., Shashkov I.G., Kochetkov A.V. Prostranstvennyy deformatsionnyy nelineynyy raschet zhelezobetonnykh izgibayemykh konstruktsiy metodom konechnykh elementov Spatial deformation nonlinear calculation of reinforced concrete flexible structures using the finite element method // Naukovedeniye: Internet-zhurnal, 2013. №5. Available at: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ prostranstvennyy-deformatsionnyy-nelineynyy-raschet-zhelezobetonnyh-izgibaemyh-konstruktsiy-metodom-konechnyh-elementov (accessed: August 25, 2019).
  23. Warnke K.J., Warnke E.P. Constitutive model for the triaxial behavior of concrete // Seminar of concrete structures subjected to triaxial stresses. Dergamo, 1974. Vol. 19. P. 3–11.
  24. Drucker D.C., Prager W. Soil mechanics and plastic analysis for limit design // Quarterly of Applied Mathematics. 1952. No. 2. P. 157–165.
  25. Bazant Z.P., Cedolin L. Fracture mechanics of reinforced concrete // Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division ASCE. 1980. Vol. 106. P. 1287–1306.
  26. Charles B., Norris C.B. Strength of orthotropic materials subjected to combined stresses. Forest Products Laboratory Report, 1962. P. 41.
  27. Tsai S.W., Wu E.M. A General Theory of Strength for Anisotropic Materials // Journal of Composite Materials. 1971. No. 5 (1). P. 58–80. DOI: 10.1177/002199837100500106.
  28. Tarnopolskiy Yu.M., Kintsis T.Ya. Metody staticheskikh ispytaniy armirovannykh plastikov. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. [Methods of static testing of reinforced plastics. 2nd ed., rev. and add.]. M.: Khimiya, 1975. 262 s.
  29. Hankinson R.L. Investigation of crushing strength of spruce at varying angles of grain // Air Force Information Circular. 1921. No. 259. P. 130.
  30. Tarnopolskiy Yu.M., Skudra A.M. Konstruktsionnaya prochnost' i deformativnost stekloplastikov [Structural strength and deformability of fiberglass]. Riga: Zinatne, 1966. 266 s.
  31. Klovanich S.F., Karpenko S.N. O raschete prostranstvennykh zhelezobetonnykh konstruktsiy metodom konechnykh elementov [On the calculation of spatial reinforced concrete structures by the finite element method] // Beton i zhelezobeton v tretem tysyacheletii: sb. tr. Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Rostov-n/D, 2000. S.179–184.
  32. Karpenko N.I., Mukhamediyev T.A., Petrov A.N. Iskhodnyye i transformirovannyye diagrammy deformirovaniya betona i armatury [Initial and transformed diagrams of deformation of concrete and reinforcement] // Napryazhenno-deformirovannoye sostoyaniye betonnykh i zhelezobetonnykh konstruktsiy. M.: NIIZhB, 1986. S. 7–25.
  33. Karpenko N.I. Obshchiye modeli mekhaniki zhelezobetona. M.: Stroyizdat, 1996. 416 s.
  34. Dzyuba V.A., Glushakova YU.S. Primeneniye sostavnoy funktsii diagrammy szhatogo betona dlya deformatsionnoy otsenki konstruktsiy [The use of the composite function of a diagram of compressed concrete for the deformation assessment of structures] // Uchenyye zapiski KnAGTU. Ser.: Nauki o prirode i tekhnike. 2014. T. II. №1 (18). S. 109–114.
  35. Taranukha N.A., Vasilev A.S. Chislennoye modelirovaniye povedeniya slozhnykh kompozitnykh konstruktsiy v oblasti ikh predelnykh sostoyaniy [Numerical modeling of the behavior of complex composite structures in the region of their limiting states] // Nauka. Innovatsii. Tekhnika i tekhnologii: problemy, dostizheniya i perspektivy: materialy Mezhdunar. nauchn.-prakt. konf. (Komsomolsk-na-Amure, 12–16 maya 2015 g.). Komsomolsk-na-Amure: KnAGTU, 2015. S. 96–99.
  36. Grezin V.M. Issledovaniye prochnosti i deformativnosti stekloplastika AG-4S pri kratkovremennykh i dlitelnykh nagruzkakh [The study of the strength and deformability of fiberglass AG-4C with short-term and long-term loads] // Trudy Voronezhskogo inzhenerno-stroitel'nogo instituta. 1967. №13. Vyp. 2. S. 3–8.
  37. Oreshko E.I., Erasov V.S., Yastrebov A.S. Prognozirovaniye prochnostnykh i deformatsionnykh kharakteristik materialov pri ispytaniyakh na rastyazheniye i polzuchest [Prediction of strength and deformation characteristics of materials during tensile and creep tests] // Materialovedeniye. 2019. №1. S. 3–9.
  38. Taranukha N.A., Vasilev A.S. Chislennoye issledovaniye predelnoy nesushchey sposobnosti konstruktsiy iz kompozitnykh materialov [Prediction of strength and deformation characteristics of materials during tensile and creep tests] // Morskiye intellektualnye tekhnologii. Ser.: Korablestroyeniye, informatika, vychislitelnaya tekhnika i upravleniye. 2015. T. 2. №3 (29). C. 27–32.
  39. Taranukha N.A., Vasilev A.S. Algoritmy i modeli pri chislennom proyektirovanii kompozitnykh sred na zadannyye kharakteristiki dlya morskikh sooruzheniy [Algorithms and models for the numerical design of composite media for specified characteristics for offshore structures] // Uchenyye zapiski KnAGTU. Ser.: Nauki o prirode i tekhnike. 2015. T. I. №1 (21). S. 81–86.
  40. Bazant Z.P., Oh B.H. Crack band theory for fracture of concrete // Materials and structures. 1983. Vol. 16. P. 155–176.
  41. Lin C.S., Scordelis A.C. Nonlinear analysis of RC shells of general form // Journal of structural division. 1975. Vol. 101. No. ST3. P. 523–538.
  42. Vasilyev A.S., Taranukha N.A. Algorithms and numerical model for the research of limit state of structures of composite materials // The 29th Asia-Pacific Technikal Exchange and Advisory Meeting on Marine Structures (TEAM-2015). Vladivostok, 2015. P. 29–34.
  43. Laws N. A note on interaction energies associated with cracks in anisotropic solids // Philosophical Magazine. 1977. No. 36 (2). P. 367–372. DOI: 10.1080/14786437708244940.
  44. Pinho S., Davila C., Camanho P. et al. Failure models and criteria for FRP under in-plane or three-dimensional stress states including shear non-linearity. NASA, 2005. P. 61.
  45. Davila C., Navin J. Failure Criteria for FRP Laminates in Plane-Stress / NASA Langley Research Center. 2003. P. 28.
  46. Tyshkevich V.N. Vybor kriteriyev prochnosti dlya trub iz armirovannykh plastikov [The choice of strength criteria for pipes made of reinforced plastics] // Izvestiya VolgGTU. 2011. №5 (78). S. 76–79.
  47. Karpov V.V., Semenov A.A. Kriterii prochnosti dlya tonkostennykh ortotropnykh obolochek. Ch. 1: Analiz osnovnykh kriteriyev prochnosti izotropnykh i ortotropnykh materialov [Strength criteria for thin-walled orthotropic shells. Part 1: Analysis of the main criteria for the strength of isotropic and orthotropic materials] // Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2014. №6 (47). S. 43–51.
  48. Aliyev M.M., Bayburova M.M. Kriterii kratkovremennoy prochnosti anizotropnykh materialov i primeneniye ikh dlya resheniya zadach predelnogo ravnovesiya [Criteria for the short-term strength of anisotropic materials and their application for solving problems of ultimate equilibrium] // Vestnik SamGU. Yestestvennonauchnaya seriya. 2007. №6 (56). S. 22–29.
  49. Structural Materials Handbook. ESA Publications Division, 1994. Vol. 1. 564 p.
  50. Sullins R.T. Manual for Structural Stability Analysis of Sandwich Plates and Shells. CR-145. NASA. 1969. P. 9–15.
  51. Sudzuki N., Arakava T., Yamaura T., Kakikhara S., Muroaka R. Primeneniye trub s vysokoy deformatsionnoy sposobnostyu pri izgotovlenii metodom kholodnogo izgiba krivolineynykh otvodov s bolshim uglom [The use of pipes with high deformation ability in the manufacture by cold bending of curved bends with a large angle] // Gazovaya promyshlennost. 2007. Spetsvypusk №4 (762). S. 66–71.
  52. Muyzemnek A.Yu., Kartashova E.D. Mekhanika deformirovaniya i razrusheniya polimernykh sloistykh kompozitsionnykh materialov: ucheb. posobiye [The mechanics of deformation and fracture of polymer layered composite materials: tutorial]. Penza: Izd-vo PGU, 2017 S. 39–42.
  53. Goldenblat I.I., Kopnov V.A. Kriterii prochnosti i plastichnosti konstruktsionnykh materialov [Strength and ductility criteria for structural materials]. M.: Mashinostroyeniye, 1968. 192 s.
  54. Makovenko S.Ya. O vzaimnosti komponent tenzorov prochnosti nekotorykh teoriy prochnosti anizotropnykh materialov [On the reciprocity of the components of the strength tensors of some theories of the strength of anisotropic materials] // Stroitelnaya mekhanika inzhenernykh konstruktsiy i sooruzheniy. 2005. №1. S. 65–70.
  55. Vasilev V.V. Mekhanika konstruktsiy iz kompozitsionnykh materialov [Mechanics of structures made of composite materials]. M.: Mashinostroyeniye, 1988. 272 s.
  56. Vasilev V.V., Protasov V.D., Bolotin V.V. Kompozitsionnyye materialy: sprav. [Composite materials: references book] M.: Mashinostroyeniye, 1990. 272 s.
  57. Grishin V.I., Dzyuba A.S., Dudarkov Yu.I. Prochnost i ustoychivost elementov i soyedineniy aviatsionnykh konstruktsiy iz kompozitov [Strength and stability of elements and joints of aircraft structures made of composites]. M.: Izd-vo fiz.-matem. lit., 2013. 272 s.
  58. Abrate S. Criteria for yielding or failure of cellular materials // Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials. 2008. Vol. 10. P. 5–51.
  59. Daniel L.M., Ishai O. Engineering Mechanics of Composite materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994. 432 p.
  60. Basharov E.A., Erkov A.P. Metod rascheta mnogosloynogo paketa iz polimernogo kompozitsionnogo materiala s uchetom vybora kriteriya prochnosti [The method of calculating a multilayer package of polymer composite material, taking into account the choice of strength criterion] // Polet. 2018. №6. S. 39–53.
  61. Puck A. Festigkeitsberechnung an Glasfaser/Kunststoff-Laminaten bei zusam-mengesetzter Beanspruchung // Kunststoffe. 1969. Vol. 59. No. 11. P. 780–787.
  62. Knops M. Analysis of Failure in Fiber Polymer Laminates. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. 205 p. DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-75765-8.
  63. Gdoutos E.E., Daniel I.M., Wang K.A. Multiaxial characterization and modeling of a PVC cellular foam // Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials. 2001. Vol. 14. P. 365–373.
  64. Puck A., Kopp J., Knops M. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models // Computer Science Technology. 2002. Vol. 62. P. 1633–1662.
  65. Puck A., Kopp J., Knops M. Guidelines for the determination of the parameters in Pucks action plane strength criterion // Computer Science Technology. 2002. Vol. 62. P. 371–378.
  66. Belov A.V., Neumoina N.G. Ob ispolzovanii obobshchennogo kriteriya prochnosti Pisarenko–Lebedeva v raschetakh na prochnost pri neizotermicheskikh protsessakh nagruzheniya [On the use of the generalized strength criterion Pisarenko–Lebedev in strength calculations for nonisothermal loading processes] // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental'nykh issledovaniy. 2014. №9–2. S. 8–10.
  67. Pisarenko G.S., Lebedev A.A. Deformirovaniye i prochnost' materialov pri slozhnom napryazhennom sostoyanii [Deformation and strength of materials under complex stress state]. Kiyev: Naukova dumka, 1976. 415 s.
  68. Lebedev A.A. Razvitiye teoriy prochnosti v mekhanike materialov [The development of theories of strength in the mechanics of materials] // Problemy prochnosti. 2010. №5. S. 127–146.
  69. Karpov Ya.S., Stavichenko V.G. Issledovaniye i analiz sposobov udovletvoreniya kriteriyam prochnosti sloistogo kompozitsionnogo materiala [Research and analysis of ways to meet the strength criteria of a layered composite material] // Aviatsionno-kosmicheskaya tekhnika i tekhnologiya. 2004. Vyp. 1. S. 3–10.
  70. Karpov Ya.S., Stavichenko V.G. Sravnitelnyy analiz podkhodov k otsenke prochnosti sloistykh kompozitsionnykh materialov [Comparative analysis of approaches to assessing the strength of layered composite materials] // Problemy prochnosti. 2008. №4. S. 36–42.
  71. Borovkov A.I. Vozmozhnosti sistemy konechno-elementnogo modelirovaniya ANSYS/LS–DYNA [Possibilities of the finite element modeling system ANSYS/LS–DYNA] // Sb. materialov I Mezhdunar. konf. polzovateley programmnogo obespecheniya ANSYS E. M.: EMT–ANSYS-tsentr, 2003. S. 128–136.
  72. Kollerov M.Yu., Gusev D.E., Oreshko E.I. Eksperimentalno-teoreticheskoye obosnovaniye vybora metoda i implantatov dlya ustraneniya voronkoobraznoy deformatsii grudnoy kletki [Experimental and theoretical justification of the choice of method and implants for eliminating the funnel-shaped deformation of the chest] // Nauchnyye trudy (Vestnik MATI). 2012. №19 (91). S. 331–336.
  73. Gusev D.E., Kollerov M.Yu., Rudakov S.S., Korolev P.A., Oreshko E.I. Otsenka biomekhanicheskoy sovmestimosti implantiruyemykh opornykh plastin iz splavov na osnove titana i nikelida titana metodom kompyuternogo modelirovaniya [Estimation of the biomechanical compatibility of implantable support plates from alloys based on titanium and titanium nickelide by computer simulation] // Titan. 2011. №3 (33). S. 39–44.
  74. Oreshko E.I., Erasov V.S., Lashov O.A., Podzhivotov N.Yu., Kachan D.V. Chislennoye issledovaniye nesushchey sposobnosti sloistogo materiala [Numerical study of the bearing capacity of a layered material] // Vse materialy. Entsiklopedicheskiy spravochnik. 2019. №3. S. 16–21.
  75. Dimitrienko Yu.I., Lutsenko A.N., Gubareva E.A., Oreshko E.I., Bazyleva O.A., Sborshhikov S.V. Raschet mekhanicheskikh kharakteristik zharoprochnykh intermetallidnykh splavov na osnove nikelya metodom mnogomasshtabnogo modelirovaniya struktury [Calculating of mechanical characteristics of heat resistant intermetallic alloys on the basis of nickel by method of multi-scale modeling of structure] // Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii. 2016. №3 (42). S. 33–48. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2016-0-3-33-48.
  76. Grinevich D.V., Yakovlev N.O., Slavin A.V. Kriterii razrusheniya kompozitsionnykh materialov (obzor) [The criteria of the failure of polymer matrix composites (review)] // Trudy VIAM: elektron. nauch.-tehnich. zhurn. 2019. №7 (79). St. 11. Available at: http://viam-works.ru (accessed: August 25, 2019). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2019-0-7-92-111.
  77. Kravchuk A.S., Smalyuk A.F., Kravchuk A.I. Elektronnaya biblioteka mekhaniki i fiziki. Lektsii po ANSYS s primerami resheniya zadach: metod. posobiye v 5 ch. [Electronic library of mechanics and physics. Lectures on ANSYS with examples of problem solving: method. allowance in 5 parts]. Minsk, 2013. Ch. 4. 118 s.
  78. Oreshko E.I., Erasov V.S., Lutsenko A.N. Kriticheskiye napryazheniya poteri ustoychivosti v gibridnykh sloistykh plastinakh [Critical stresses of loss of stability in hybrid laminated plates] // Materialovedeniye. 2016. №11. S. 17–21.
  79. Oreshko E.I., Erasov V.S., Lucenko A.N., Terentev V.F., Slizov A.K. Postroenie diagramm deformirovaniya v trehmernom prostranstve σ–ε–t [Creation of the 3D stress-strain diagrams σ–ε–t] // Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii. 2017. №1 (46). S. 61–68. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2017-0-1-61-68.
  80. Antipov V.V., Oreshko E.I., Erasov V.S., Serebrennikova N.Y. Hybrid laminates for application in north conditions // Mechanics of Composite Materials. 2016. Vol. 24. P. 1–12.
  81. Browell R., Lin G. The Power of Nonlinear Materials Capability, Part 1 and 2 on modeling materials with nonlinear characteristics // ANSYS Solutions. 2000. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 8–10.
  82. Oreshko E.I., Erasov V.S., Lashov O.A., Podzhivotov N.Yu., Kachan D.V. Raschet napryazheniy v sloistom material [Calculation of tension in a layered material] // Trudy VIAM: elektron. nauch.-tekhnich. zhurn. 2018. №10 (70). St. 11. Available at: http://viam-works.ru (accessed: August 25, 2019). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2018-0-10-93-106.
  83. Kollerov M.Yu., Usikov V.D., Kuftov V.S., Gusev D.E., Oreshko E.I. Mediko-tekhnicheskoye obosnovaniye ispolzovaniya titanovykh splavov v implantiruyemykh konstruktsiyakh dlya stabilizatsii pozvonochnika [Medical and technical substantiation of the use of titanium alloys in implantable structures for stabilization of the spine] // Titan. 2013. №1 (40). S. 39–45.
  84. Vasilev A.S. Matematicheskoye modelirovaniye i chislennoye issledovaniye kompozitnykh materialov v oblasti predelnoy prochnosti: dis. … kand. tekhn. Nauk [Mathematical modeling and numerical study of composite materials in the field of ultimate strength: thesis, Cand. Sc. (Tech.)]. Komsomolsk-na-Amure, 2016. 165 s.