Influence of the technological FDM-modes of the press and structure of used materials on physic-mechanical characteristics of FDM-models (review)

Kondrashov S.V., Pykhtin A.A., Larionov S.A., Sorokin A.E.
UDC
678.8
DOI
10.18577/2307-6046-2019-0-10-34-49
Article PDF (Russian) (971.4 KB)
How to cite
Kondrashov S.V., Pykhtin A.A., Larionov S.A., Sorokin A.E. Influence of the technological FDM-modes of the press and structure of used materials on physic-mechanical characteristics of FDM-models (review) // Proceedings of VIAM. 2019. No. 10. DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2019-0-10-34-49. URL: https://test.viam.ru/en/journal/2019/10/4
Keywords
additive technologies, FDM-printing, physicomechanical properties, the technological mode, materials for FDM-printing.
Abstract

In work the analysis of scientific and technical literature in the field of influence of technological modes on physic-mechanical properties of the samples received in the way of the FDM press is carried out. It is shown that strength characteristics of the details made with use of optimum parameters of the press, closely come nearer to properties of the products received in the way of pressure casting. Basic approaches for receiving samples with thermal stability more than 200°C and with the durability more than 100 MPa are revealed. The circle of research tasks which need to be solved for transition from prototyping to manufacturing of real details, specific devices and designs is defined.

Reference list
  1. Kablov E.N. Innovacionnye razrabotki FGUP «VIAM» GNC RF po realizacii «Strategicheskih napravlenij razvitiya materialov i tehnologij ih pererabotki na period do 2030 goda» [Innovative developments of FSUE «VIAM» SSC of RF on realization of «Strategic directions of the development of materials and technologies of their processing for the period until 2030»] // Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii. 2015. №1 (34). S. 3–33. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2015-0-1-3-33.
  2. Kablov E.N., Semenova L.V., Petrova G.N. i dr. Polimernyye kompozitsionnyye materialy na termoplastichnoy matritse [Polymer composite materials on a thermoplastic matrix] // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Ser.: Khimiya i khimicheskaya tekhnologiya. 2016. T. 59. №10. S. 61–71.
  3. Kablov E.N., Yakovlev N.O., Kharitonov G.M., Mekalina I.V. Osobennosti relaksatsionnogo povedeniya polimernykh stekol na osnove polimetilmetakrilata i ikh uchet pri prochnostnom raschete aviatsionnogo ostekleniya [Features of the relaxation behavior of polymer glasses based on polymethyl methacrylate and their consideration in the strength calculation of aviation glazing] // Vse materialy. Entsiklopedicheskiy spravochnik. 2016. №9. S. 2–9.
  4. Kablov E.N. Tendentsii i oriyentiry innovatsionnogo razvitiya Rossii: sb. nauch.-informats. materialov. 3-ye izd. [Trends and guidelines for the innovative development of Russia: collection of scientific and information materials. 3rd ed. ]. M.: VIAM, 2015. 720 s.
  5. Petrova G.N., Larionov S.A., Platonov M.M., Perfilova D.N. Termoplastichnye materialy novogo pokoleniya dlya aviacii [Thermoplastic materials of new generation for aviation] // Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii 2017. №S. S. 420–436. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2017-0-S-420-436.
  6. Kondrashov S.V., Shashkeev K.A., Petrova G.N., Mekalina I.V. Polimernye kompozicionnye materialy konstrukcionnogo naznacheniya s funkcionalnymi svojstvami [Constructional polymer composites with functional properties] // Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii. 2017. №S. S. 405–419. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2017-0-S-405-419.
  7. Pavlyuk B.Ph. Osnovnye napravleniya v oblasti razrabotki polimernyh funktsionalnyh materialov [The main directions in the field of development of polymeric functional materials] // Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii. 2017. №S. S. 388–392. DOI: 10.18577/2071-9140-2017-0-S-388-392.
  8. Buznik V.M. Sverhgidrofobnye materialy na osnove ftorpolimerov [Superwaterproof materials on the basis of fluoropolymers] //Aviacionnye materialy i tehnologii. 2013. №1. S. 29–34.
  9. Huang S.H., Liu P., Mokasdar A., Hou L. Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review // The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2013. Vol. 67. P. 1191–1203. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-012-4558-5.
  10. Bikas H., Stavropoulos P., Chryssolouris G. Additive manufacturing methods and modeling approaches: a critical review // The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2016. Vol. 83. P. 389–405. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-7576-2.
  11. Platonov M.M., Petrova G.N., Larionov S.A., Barbotko S.L. Optimizatsiya sostava polimernoy kompozitsii s ponizhennoy pozharnoy opasnostyu na osnove polikarbonata dlya tekhnologii 3D-pechati rasplavlennoy polimernoy nit'yu [Optimization of the composition of the polymer composition with reduced fire hazard based on polycarbonate for 3D printing technology with molten polymer thread] // Izvestiya vuzov. Ser.: Khimiya i khimicheskaya tekhnologiya. 2017. T. 60. №1. S. 87–94.
  12. Petrova G.N., Larionov S.A., Sorokin A.E., Sapego Yu.A. Sovremennyye sposoby pererabotki termoplastov [Modern ways of processing of thermoplastics] // Trudy VIAM: elektron. nauch.-tehnich. zhurn. 2017. №11 (59). St. 07. Available at: http://www.viam-works.ru (accessed: September 14, 2019). DOI: 10.18577/2307-6046-2017-0-11-7-7.
  13. Hill N., Haghi M. Deposition direction-dependent failure criteria for fused deposition modeling polycarbonate // Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2014. Vol. 20 (3). P. 221–227. DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-04-2013-0039.
  14. Fodran E., Koch M., Menon U. Mechanical and dimensional characteristics of fused deposition modeling build styles // International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. 1996. P. 419–442.
  15. Ziemian C., Sharma M., Ziemian S. Anisotropic mechanical properties of ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modelling // Mechanical engineering. InTechOpen, 2012. P. 159–180.
  16. Ziemian S., Okwara M., Ziemian C. Tensile and fatigue behavior of layered acrylonitrile butadiene styrene // Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2015. Vol. 21. No. 3. P. 270–278.
  17. Es-Said O.S., Foyos J., Noorani R. et al. Effect of layer orientation on mechanical properties of rapid prototyped samples // Materials and Manufacturing Processes. 2000. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 107–122.
  18. Hernandez R., Slaughter D., Whaley D. et al. Analyzing the tensile, compressive, and flexural properties of 3D printed ABS P430 plastic based on printing orientation using fused deposition modeling // 27th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. 2016. Vol. 10. P. 939–950.
  19. Ahn S.H., Montero M., Odell D. et al. Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS // Rapid prototyping journal. 2002. Vol. 8. No. 4. P. 248–257.
  20. Rodríguez J.F., Thomas J.P., Renaud J.E. Mechanical behavior of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) fused deposition materials. Experimental investigation // Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2001. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 148–158.
  21. Fatimatuzahraa A.W., Farahaina B., Yusoff W.A.Y. The effect of employing different raster orientations on the mechanical properties and microstructure of Fused Deposition Modeling parts // 2011 IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications (ISBEIA). 2011. P. 22–27.
  22. Raney K., Lani E., Kalla D.K. Experimental characterization of the tensile strength of ABS parts manufactured by fused deposition modeling process // Materials Today: proceedings. 2017. Vol. 4. No. 8. P. 7956–7961.
  23. Sun Q., Rizvi G.M., Bellehumeur C.T., Gu P. Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments // Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2008. Vol. 14. No. 2. P. 72–80.
  24. Onwubolu G.C., Rayegani F. Characterization and optimization of mechanical properties of ABS parts manufactured by the fused deposition modelling process // International Journal of Manufacturing Engineering. 2014. Vol. 2014. P. 1–14.
  25. Rankouhi B., Javadpour S., Delfanian F. et al. Failure analysis and mechanical characterization of 3D printed ABS with respect to layer thickness and orientation // Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention. 2016. Vol. 16. No. 3. P. 467–481.
  26. Wang J., Xie H., Weng Z. et al. A novel approach to improve mechanical properties of parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling // Materials & Design. 2016. Vol. 105. P. 152–159.
  27. Croccolo D., De Agostinis M., Olmi G. Experimental characterization and analytical modelling of the mechanical behaviour of fused deposition processed parts made of ABS-M30 // Computational Materials Science. 2013. Vol. 79. P. 506–518.
  28. Torrado A.R., Roberson D.A. Failure analysis and anisotropy evaluation of 3D-printed tensile test specimens of different geometries and print raster patterns // Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention. 2016. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 154–164.
  29. Cantrell J.T., Rohde S., Damiani D. еt al. Experimental characterization of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed ABS and polycarbonate parts // Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2017. Vol. 23. No. 4. С. 811–824.
  30. Górski F., Wichniarek R., Kuczko W. et al. Experimental determination of critical orientation of ABS parts manufactured using fused deposition modelling technology // Journal of Machine Engineering. 2015. Vol. 15. No. 4. P. 121–132.
  31. Górski F., Kuczko W., Wichniarek R. Impact strength of ABS parts manufactured using Fused Deposition Modeling technology // Archives of Mechanical Technology and Automation. 2014. Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 3–12.
  32. Bertoldi M., Yardimci M.A., Pistor C.M. et al. Mechanical characterization of parts processed via fused deposition // International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. 1998. P. 557–566.
  33. Sood A.K., Ohdar R.K., Mahapatra S.S. Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts // Materials & Design. 2010. Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 287–295.
  34. Sood A.K., Ohdar R.K., Mahapatra S.S. Experimental investigation and empirical modelling of FDM process for compressive strength improvement // Journal of Advanced Research. 2012. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 81–90.
  35. Lee B.H., Abdullah J., Khan Z.A. Optimization of rapid prototyping parameters for production of flexible ABS object // Journal of materials processing technology. 2005. Vol. 169. No. 1. P. 54–61.
  36. Barvinskiy I.A., Barvinskaya I.E. Spravochnik po lit'yevym termoplastichnym materialam [Handbook of injection thermoplastic materials ]. Available at: http://www. barvinsky. ru (accessed: August 16, 2019).
  37. Fernandez-Vicente M., Calle W., Ferrandiz et al. Effect of infill parameters on tensile mechanical behavior in desktop 3D printing // 3D printing and additive manufacturing. 2016. Vol. 3. No. 3. P. 183–192.
  38. Baich L., Manogharan G., Marie H. Study of infill print design on production cost-time of 3D printed ABS parts // International Journal of Rapid Manufacturing. 2015. Vol. 5. No. 3–4. P. 308–319.
  39. Mahmood S., Qureshi A.J., Goh K.L. et al. Tensile strength of partially filled FFF printed parts: experimental results // Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2017. Vol. 23. No. 1. P. 122–128.
  40. Tanikella N.G., Wittbrodt B., Pearce J.M. Tensile strength of commercial polymer materials for fused filament fabrication 3D printing // Additive Manufacturing. 2017. Vol. 15. P. 40–47.
  41. Ligon S.C., Liska R., Stampfl J. et al. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing // Chemical Reviews. 2017. Vol. 117. No. 15. P. 10212–10290.
  42. Petrova G.N., Platonov M.M., Bolshakov V.A. i dr. Issledovaniye kompleksa kharakteristik bazovykh materialov dlya FDM-tekhnologii additivnogo sinteza. Fiziko-mekhanicheskiye i teplofizicheskiye svoystva [Study of the complex characteristics of basic materials for FDM-technology of additive synthesis. Physico-mechanical and thermophysical properties] // Plasticheskiye massy. 2016. №5–6. S. 53–58.
  43. Gebisa A., Lemu H. Investigating effects of Fused-Deposition Modeling (FDM) processing parameters on flexural properties of ULTEM 9085 using designed experiment // Materials. 2018. Vol. 11. No. 4. P. 500.
  44. Jiang S., Liao G., Xu D. et al. Mechanical properties analysis of polyetherimide parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling // High Performance Polymers. 2019. Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 97–106.
  45. Gebisa A.W., Lemu H.G. Mechanical properties of ULTEM 9085 material processed by fused deposition modeling // Polymer Testing. 2018. Vol. 72. P. 335–347.
  46. Fitzharris E.R., Watt I., Rosen D.W. et al. Interlayer bonding improvement of material extrusion parts with polyphenylene sulfide using the Taguchi method // Additive Manufacturing. 2018. Vol. 24. P. 287–297.
  47. Slonov A.L., Khashirov A.A., Zhansitov A.A. et al. The influence of the 3D-printing technology on the physical and mechanical properties of polyphenylenesulfone // Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2018. Vol. 24. No. 7. P. 1124–1130.
  48. Slonov A.L., Khashirov A.A., Zhansitov A.A. et al. Mechanical Properties of Samples of PolyphenyleneSulfone Obtained by the 3D-Printing Method // Materials Science Forum. Trans. Tech. Publications. 2018. Vol. 935. P. 21–26.
  49. Rinaldi M., Ghidini T., Cecchini F. et al. Additive layer manufacturing of poly (ether ether ketone) via FDM // Composites Part B: Engineering. 2018. Vol. 145. P. 162–172.
  50. Zhao F., Li D., Jin Z. Preliminary investigation of poly-ether-ether-ketone based on fused deposition modeling for medical applications // Materials. 2018. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 288.
  51. Gantenbein S., Masania K., Woigk W. et al. Three-dimensional printing of hierarchical liquid-crystal-polymer structures // Nature. 2018. Vol. 561. No. 7722. P. 226.
  52. Fink J.K. Handbook of Engineering and Speciality Thermoplastics. 2010. Vol. 1. DOI: 10.1002/9780470881712.
  53. Hmeidat N.S., Kemp J.W., Compton B.G. High-strength epoxy nanocomposites for 3D printing // Composites Science and Technology. 2018. Vol. 160. P. 9–20.
  54. Dawoud M., Taha I., Ebeid S.J. Strain sensing behaviour of 3D printed carbon black filled ABS // Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 2018. Vol. 35. P. 337–342.
  55. Hohimer C.J., Petrossian G., Ameli A. et al. Electrical conductivity and piezoresistive response of 3D printed thermoplastic polyurethane/multiwalled carbon nanotube composites // Behavior and Mechanics of Multifunctional Materials and Composites XII. 2018. Vol. 10596. P. 105960J.
  56. Quill T.J., Smith M.K., Zhou T. et al. Thermal and mechanical properties of 3D printed boron nitride–ABS composites // Applied Composite Materials. 2018. Vol. 25. No. 5. P. 1205–1217.
  57. Francis V., Jain P.K. Investigation on the effect of surface modification of 3D printed parts by nanoclay and dimethyl ketone // Materials and Manufacturing Processes. 2018. Vol. 33. No. 10. P. 1080–1092.
  58. Paspali A., Bao Y., Gawne D.T. et al. The influence of nanostructure on the mechanical properties of 3D printed polylactide/nanoclay composites // Composites Part B: Engineering. 2018. Vol. 152. P. 160–168.
  59. Sorokin A.E., Larionov S.A., Krayev I.D. i dr. Funktsionalizovannyye termoplastichnyye filamenty dlya dvumatrichnykh PKM, izgotovlennykh metodom 3D-pechati [Functionalized thermoplastic filaments for two-matrix PCMs made by 3D printing] // V Mezhdunar. konf. «Additivnyye tekhnologii nastoyashcheye i budushcheye» (Moskva, 22 marta 2019). M.: VIAM, 2019. S. 361–376.
  60. Aslanzadeh S., Saghlatoon H., Honari M.M. et al. Investigation on electrical and mechanical properties of 3D printed nylon 6 for RF/microwave electronics // Additive Manufacturing. 2018. Vol. 21. P. 69–75.
  61. Çanti E., Aydin M. Effects of micro particle reinforcement on mechanical properties of 3D printed parts // Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2018. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 171–176.
  62. Yamamoto B.E., Trimble A.Z., Minei B. et al. Development of multifunctional nanocomposites with 3D printing additive manufacturing and low graphene loading // Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials. 2019. Vol. 32. No. 3. P. 383–408.
  63. Spoerk M., Sapkota J., Weingrill G. et al. Shrinkage and Warpage Optimization of Expanded Perlite Filled Polypropylene Composites in Extrusion Based Additive Manufacturing // Macromolecular Materials and Engineering. 2017. Vol. 302. P. 1700143.
  64. Zhong W., Li F., Zhang Z. et al. Short fiber reinforced composites for fused deposition modeling // Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2001. Vol. 301. No. 2. P. 125–130.
  65. Shofner M.L., Lozano K., Rodríguez-Macías F.J. et al. Nanofiber reinforced polymers prepared by fused deposition modeling // Journal of applied polymer science. 2003. Vol. 89. No. 11. P. 3081–3090.
  66. Ning F., Cong W., Qiu J. et al. Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling // Composites Part B: Engineering. 2015. Vol. 80. P. 369–378.
  67. Papon E.A., Haque A. Fracture toughness of additively manufactured carbon fiber reinforced composites // Additive Manufacturing. 2019. Vol. 26. P. 41–52.
  68. Tekinalp H.L., Kunc V., Velez-Garcia G.M. et al. Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing // Composites Science and Technology. 2014. Vol. 105. P. 144–150.
  69. Fonseca J., Ferreira I.A., de Moura M.F.S.F. et al. Study of the interlaminar fracture under mode I loading on FFF printed parts // Composite Structures. 2019. Vol. 214. P. 316–324.
  70. Equbal A., Equbal M.A., Sood A.K. et al. A Review and Reflection on Part Quality Improvement of Fused Deposition Modelled Parts. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018. Vol. 455. P. 012072.
  71. Wang X., Jiang M., Zhou Z. et al. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective // Composites Part B. 2017. Vol. 110. P. 442–458.
  72. Matsuzaki R., Ueda M., Namiki M. et al. Three-dimensional printing of continuous-fiber composites by in-nozzle impregnation // Scientific Reports. 2016. Vol. 6. P. 23058.
  73. Van Der Klift F., Koga Y., Todoroki A. et al. 3D printing of continuous carbon fibre reinforced thermo-plastic (CFRTP) tensile test specimens // Open Journal of Composite Material. 2016. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. 18–27.
  74. Mori K., Maeno T., Nakagawa Y. Dieless forming of carbon fibre reinforced plastic parts using 3D printer // Procedia Engineering. 2014. Vol. 81. P. 1595–1600.
  75. Bettini P., Alitta G., Sala G. et al. Fused deposition technique for continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic // Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 2017. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 843–848.
  76. Melenka G.W., Cheung B.K., Schofield J.S. et al. Evaluation and prediction of the tensile properties of continuous fiber-reinforced 3D printed structures // Composite Structures. 2016. Vol. 153. P. 866–875.
  77. Tian X., Liu T., Yang C. et al. Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites // Composites. Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2016. Vol. 88. P. 198–205.
  78. Li N., Li Y., Liu S. Rapid prototyping of continuous carbon fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites by 3D printing // Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2016. Vol. 238. P. 218–225.
  79. Yang C., Tian X., Liu T. et al. 3D printing for continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites: mechanism and performance // Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2017. Vol. 23. No. 1. P. 209–215.
  80. Oztan C., Karkkainen R., Fittipaldi M. et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of three dimensional-printed continuous fiber composites // Journal of Composite Materials. 2019. Vol. 53. No. 2. P. 271–280.